User talk:The Norse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have recently created the article 403 Forbiddena. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Deleted content 2 Sky 3 RE: S-CRY-Ed Article 4 Making Articles about Trains 5 Response: "Your Spirit Article..." 6 Vandalism of Wild Arms 5 7 Wild Arms 5

[edit] Deleted content

Per your request, I pulled the last version of the deleted article and placed it in your userspace: User:The Norse/403 Forbiddena. The article should not be recreated in the main userspace unless you can provide sources that show it meets WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sky

Thanks for catching the extra piece of nonsense someone snuck in between my reverts. USer:Anonymous 57 and his copycat IP addresses are causing problems. --ArmadilloFromHell 22:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: S-CRY-Ed Article

Why are you deleting that entire section on the evolution of Kazuma/Ryuho's Alters? It could use some rewriting, but the information it contains should definately be noted. The Norse 21:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

it could have been written properly from the start, first off. Second, the evolution of their powers is already noted in the character sections and split off articles. Third, your addition was largely original research and unnecessary. Your perception of the theme(s) in a TV show is not notible. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 21:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ah. Thought it looked familiar. Sorry for assuming you made it. I'd be insulted, too, in your position. Still, the way it was, removal was a wise move on someone's part. You yourself admit it needs work, yet don't seem interested in doing that work. Also, your feelings toward Wikipedia's policies are irrelevant. You don't have to edit here. Besides, your understanding of what "original research" means is clearly poor. I could say "Chris Latta was an unhappy man who wanted to be a visual actor more than a voice actor". That's original research. I probably couldn't write that in a magazine, either. The sources which Wikipedia cites are held to a much higher standard then the every joe blanking Hitler to write "I own all" and other such actions. Even you must comprehend how easily any level of acceptence toward OR would lead to abuse. Batman Begins is another example of wild claims damaging an article. And yes, your comment sounded like a rant. Apology accepted. Now, as I said before, an analysis of SCRYED's theme(s) and main characters is unnecessary. Appropriate additions could be made to parts of articles already focusing on Kazuma and Ryuho separately, but that section really should stay out. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 23:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Making Articles about Trains

Why are you replacing the article on states in the Holy Roman Empire with something about trains? Academic Challenger 03:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Are you finding something wrong with my contribution methods? - The Norse 19:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response: "Your Spirit Article..."

Wow... thank you. I've spent some hours to make it, so I'm grateful that it got good. Fixing up Molly's article is going to be a little more troublesome, but I'll try to save up some of my time to read more about Molly and see what can I do about that article. - MclMadness

[edit] Vandalism of Wild Arms 5

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wild Arms 5. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Dear unsigned commentator, random, wanton spoilers in one sentence character profiles are uncalled for. Stfu. - The Norse 23:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Spoilers are allowed on Wikipedia. Personal attacks are not. --Zeno McDohl ^(talk) 00:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Character "descriptions" with no content but "THIS CHARACTER DIES LOL" are hardly encyclopedic. - The Norse 01:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

It's better than nothing. The section would simply be in need of an expansion. --Zeno McDohl ^(talk) 01:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wild Arms 5

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wild Arms 5, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Personal attacks are not allowed on Wikipedia, please refrain from doing so. --Zeno McDohl ^(talk) 00:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)