User talk:Timothy Titus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Peter Gurney
2 Giler S returns greetings
3 Fictional Freemasons
4 Masonic Lodge Officers
5 Pedantry
6 Further Pedantry

[edit] Peter Gurney

I agree with you. I've made a small start on the controversial aspects. They should certainly be present, but should not dominate. Please join in :) Fiddle Faddle 13:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Giler S returns greetings

And welcome to you! I can't comment on three of your four principal topics for editing, but I'll certainly keep an eye on the fourth... ^talkGiler S 16:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fictional Freemasons

Thanks. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 23:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Masonic Lodge Officers

I've noticed that your Lodge Officer articles are only a paragraph or two long, and I don't see how they can get any longer. Might I suggest an all-in-one general article on officers instead? MSJapan 17:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

It has been done. I was already working on the article, but your comment has spurred me back into action on it. Let me know your thoughts. Masonic Lodge Officers. Timothy Titus 20:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pedantry

If it weren't a convention that users don't edit other users' userpages, this particular user might have edited No. 4 to No. IV...

^talkGiler S 17:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply on this one; you're quite right that it may be a modern affectation (although I note that the earliest Secretarial writing paper I've seen — although admittedly probably postwar — says No. IV) but the fact remains that it's an accepted affectation, at least within the lodge, within the 18 other red apron lodges and within the Grand Stewards' Lodge. So there; the Secretary has spoken. Arguing against myself, though, it is true that the official UGLE list has us down as 4...

^talkGiler S 14:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

PS Sorry to hear you've been under the weather. Hope you're better now.

[edit] Further Pedantry

And now I come to think of it, putting London in parentheses rather implies that it's within the Metropolitan Province of London, rather than being, as you are of course aware, unattached (albeit meeting in London).

^talkGiler S 17:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I accept your counterargument! ^talkGiler S 14:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/i/m/User_talk%7ETimothy_Titus_93d6.html"

User talk:Timothy Titus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Peter Gurney

[edit] Giler S returns greetings

[edit] Fictional Freemasons

[edit] Masonic Lodge Officers

[edit] Pedantry

[edit] Further Pedantry

Views

Navigation

interaction

Search