User:Tivedshambo/Archives/2007a
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Del Lagrace Volcano
hi tivedshambo. i am working on the article on del lagrace volcano. since there are some links in other articles to this name it seems at least a person not completely irrelevant. but i know i should improve respectively extend the content of the article! hermelina
- Tag removed - though I see it the article has been deleted anyway - perhaps from lack of evidence of notability? – Tivedshambo 18:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- but why do they create links on this person in other articles if the person is so unimportant? s/he is actually very famous in the field she is working. what can i do if i want to keep the article without doing to much research on my own? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hermelina (talk • contribs) 18:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC).
- Just ensure you include some information about what makes the subject notable - see WP:N for guidelines. Include links to other websites, preferably not just the subject's own website. Don't worry if it looks untidy - other users will help to improve the article. – Tivedshambo 20:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] sean hewitt
Hi, Sorry for any inconvenience caused with this article. please can you delete/tell me how to delete images Nino Sage.png, Shewitt.jpg and Shewittthumb.jpg as there is no point keeping them. Sorry again, Infernoradio 17:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- The easiest way is to edit the image pages adding the following tag:
- {{db-self}}
- (including the curly brackets). This will alert an administrator to the fact that you wish your own work to be deleted. – Tivedshambo 17:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template talk:PotentialVanity
I'd like to propose deleting this template, as he word "vanity" can be considered defamitory (see WP:COI#Importance_of_civility). The template {{COI}} can be used instead. Anyone have any thoughts on this before I put it to WP:TFD? – Tivedshambo (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct, go for it. >Radiant< 12:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Owain.wilson's copyvios
Hey Tivedshambo, thanks for letting us know on ANI about the copyvios. I've deleted all the articles and rolledback the definitions he pasted into other articles. I think I've got them all. :/ Thanks for spotting them, tagging etc. All the best, Sarah 19:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Sarah. – Tivedshambo 20:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Translation
The article Dominant ketenprobleem is Dutch, not German... I'll discuss translation with my professor. He's the one who started this new era of scientific research (keteninformatisering) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jorgenhorstink (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Free representation unit
Im not exactly clear why a train station is any more important or relevant then london's oldest pro bono charity. please explain.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dfutter (talk • contribs) 21:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- See the following:-
- WP:ORG - notability for organisations
- User:Mangoe/Railroad line and station articles - proposed guidelines for articles about stations.
- If you feel your article is notable, feel free to resubmit it, but please include something to state why it is notable, even if it just emphasises the fact that it is London's oldest charity. Ideally, this should include relevent sources as evidence. – Tivedshambo 22:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Follow-up - as this article now has references and evidence of notability, I have removed it form the speedy deletion category. – Tivedshambo 22:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gair o ddiolch (Mallwyd)
Thanks for the release of image copyright (Mallwyd waterfalls). I hadn't realised there might be a problem there, just quickly copied the low res image. Diolch yn fawr a hwyl, 'Anatiomaros' (cy.wikipedia). 88.111.218.158 14:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC) (just popping in - and out!)
[edit] terrartist
apologies - only new to this. i agree that the term is a nelogism - so am fine with the page deletion.
is it possible to add a brief mention of the term to the article on "artivist" - as it's perhaps a sub-genre of this field.
thanks somaya
[edit] Moulsford Railway Bridge
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank-you for your article about Moulsford Railway Bridge. I've tidied it up a bit to bring it up to some basic standards (known as wikifying). Do you have any more information about this bridge? For example, which line is it on, and is it still in use? Also, are there any external websites about it that can be listed?
By the way, to link to another article in Wikipedia, enclose the article in double square brackets, e.g. [[Isambard Kingdom Brunel]]. Don't worry about making mistakes - there's a lot to learn but I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia. If you want to ask me anything, leave a message here within the next few days, or on my talk page.– Tivedshambo (talk) 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the the comments and edits - I was midway through when you posted your comments, so apologies for having saved "live" before completion. I'm afraid I'm not aware of any external sites mentioning the bridge. I'll try and get a photo shortly.
- Sciencebloke 13:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] stn art lrnk
Thank you for keeping a level head and making clear arguments. I've been at a loss for words, and my arguments for keeping this template have suffered. You've reduced my Wikimood to near-positive numbers! M0RHI | Talk to me 08:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)