Talk:Top Secret (House episode)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do we really need to have separate sections for "Referbacks" (a non-sensical term), "Clinic Patients," "Diagnosis," "Quotes" and "Medical terms?" It seems to me that over the article series, these are generally one sentence long. In particular, although I did not remove it, the "diagnosis" section is wholly unnecessary as it's just a plot point and serves no other purpose; it should simply be stated at the point at which it occurs in "Plot Overview" I removed the subsections and condensed them into "trivia and notes" which makes much more sense as each episode only has about maybe four sections which require any further explanation. For example, we don't need to make a new section every time Chase makes some coment to Cameron, either make a single short note about developing relationships or put it in "Plot Overview" Mooshimanx 18:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sections exist for ease of perusal, so a reader doesn't have to read a 500 word plot summary to find a particular piece of information. This is especially true in the case of "diagnosis". Swakeman 09:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's not correct; there doesn't need to be 12 sections; please review WP:TRIV. While one trivia section is fine, all of these can be worked into the article. It makes little sense revert the article to an uninformative version in which the patient is not even identified by his name and there are more section titles than actual lines of informative information. If the current plot summary is too long, feel free to edit it to a shorter summary. Furthermore, the notes on "when the show originally aired" in terms of timeslot are wholly immaterial and subject to rapid deletion. The show itself did not run longer than usual, it simply ran in a 7 minute different time slot. This kind
-
-
- I don't recall defending a section concerning timeslot or pointless sections concerning "Arc Advancement". However, the article can be better served by using sections wisely than by lumping all the information into an epic summary. Swakeman 04:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Feel free to reduce the expanded summary; the one you keep restoring is flatly uninformative about the content of the episode. Furthermore, if you don't like all the random sections, stop putting them back.
-
-
Calling Gulf War Syndrome non-existent is POV: The show takes the tack that it is non-existent, except for Chase who functions as a mouthpiece for advocates of GWS' existence, but this should not be the tack that this article takes. It also contradicts the GWS article. ArekExcelsior 05:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
