Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||||||||
| Argued November 7, 2001 Decided January 8, 2002 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Holding | |||||||||||
| Court membership | |||||||||||
| Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer |
|||||||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||||||
| Majority by: O'Connor Joined by: unanimous |
|||||||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||||||
| Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 | |||||||||||
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted what the phrase "substantially impairs" in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 means.
[edit] References
- ^ 534 U.S. 184 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.
This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
