Talk:U.S. Route 9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Would the US 1 shield be acceptable here, I'm having 2nd thoughts about the US 1 shield there because that goes to another street before US Route 1. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker (talk • contribs).
- Whether or not the interchange is 100% complete is fairly irrelevant, and the fact that it uses a connector road doesn't make the junction incomplete (especially since US 1 and 9 are not limited access freeways here). US 1 should definitely be listed as a major junction in the infobox. -- NORTH talk 15:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
US 1 yes; NJ 35 no. -- NORTH talk 23:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Would Route 440 be acceptable on the US Route 9 info box? since it's coming off the GSP too, or is that too much since it's ok the Pakrway info box?
[edit] US Route 9 and 440
Would Route 440 be acceptable on the US Route 9 info box? since it's coming off the GSP too, or is that too much since or is it unnecessary, NORTH
Nextbarker 21:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Dan
Would a US 1 shield be acceptable on the info box because to get to US 9 south from US 1 North you have to exit onto Green Street in Woodbridge.
24.228.70.72 04:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)nextbarker
I thought there was a US 1 shield in the major info box, is that too much?
Nextbarker 06:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC) nextbarker
[edit] Cleanup
I'm in the process of expanding this article, cleaning it up, splitting it into state by state articles, etc. I'd appreciate it if no major changes were made to it in the meantime -- not that I can stop you. But definitely feel free to make minor changes and the like. -- NORTH talk 22:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)