User talk:Vincentvivi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Lanky2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lanky2.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FLCL
As a userbox fan of FLCL, would you be willing to vote for its nomination at Wikipedia's Article Improvement Drive? If elected, it will be the subject of a week-long overhaul, in an attempt to pass in to Featured Article status! Thanks, Litefantastic 17:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Logo2006countryfile.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo2006countryfile.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] *stalk stalk stalk*
Hahaha. St Bobbit III 21:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] monarchic troubles
You might want to take a look at Constance Holland and gauge the feeling there about deletion..
I've been checking, and many of the English nobility articles for that period see to have data misread or misunderstood from online abridgments of the Peerage.Take a look at Thomas de Mowbray, 4th Earl of Norfolk who is NOT the 4th Earl but the first Duke. There was no Earl of Norfolk. cf DNB online. I suspect there is further confusion, but this only a side interest of mine on WP.DGG 05:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- further confusion: Take a look at Thomas de Mowbray, 4th Earl of Norfolk who may have been the 4th Earl (a lesser title) but is in Oxford DNB as 2nd Earl of Nottingham. I have moved the page, but not fixed all the boxes and links
