Talk:Virtual community of practice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Community WikiProject, which gives a central approach to Community and related subjects on Wikipedia. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Expand, rename or merge?
What shall we do with this article? According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, this article ought to be Virtual community of practice (which redirects to here). I know that in some literature VCoP is used, which could justify its current name. I have no strong opinion one way or the other on that. I think, however, the first order of business should be deciding to expand or merge with Virtual community, which is also planned to be overhauled. My vote is to merge and make it a section in Virtual community — WP:FA candidate (per WikiProject Community only, so far). IMO, this would be the most efficient outlay of our "social capital", for what it's worth • CQ 19:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree with you. Communities are not equal to communities of practice. Similarly virtual communities of practice are not equal to virtual communities. Merging this item with Virtual communities would detract from the concept's independence.
In my opinion, the two articles should definitely be linked to each other, as should this phenomena be mentioned in CoP and viceversa. This theory should be expanded as much research has been undertaken over the last year in the field.
In my opinion a bigger question is whether it may be merged with community based/driven knowledge management.
