Talk:Vojislav Koštunica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
More information about this article... This article has a deprecated non-null importance= parameter. It should be replaced with priority=.

	Serbia Portal Vojislav Koštunica is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

Honestly, I don't like the guy either. But that's beside the point. Referring to him as rude, particularly in the way the previous section was written, is not neutral, and does not belong in Wikipedia. However, it has now been rewritten nicely, and I think it now addresses the objections well, and in an NPOV manner.Ambivalenthysteria 00:29, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I wanted to say that he is sujetan. The word I found in the dictionary is conceited. I am not really sure is that the right word. Plus, I don`t know how to explain that he has political complexes and that he refuses to support Boris Tadic just because he hated Zoran Djindjic. I want it in NPOV but don`t know how. Also how to say that he is incompetent for any high level job. That he was almost never joining protests against Milosevic. That he didn`t want Milosevic to get arrested. That he never cooperates with journalists. That only time he called press while he was the president of Yugoslavia was when he saw an OWL in the tree in front of his office!!! This guy is just........

Avala 11:45, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I think the animosity against Đinđić and Tadić can be explained together with the fact he led the faction of DS that split off into DSS. The stance on Milošević seems fairly relevant, too, and can be explained in a sentence or two. The rest is rather quirky to explain :) --Shallot 20:24, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Also how to say that he is incompetent for any high level job And who are you to decide who's and who's not "competent" for high level jobs? I don't want to rush into discussion on that topic, just to remaind you that this is an ecyclopedic article and not a discussion forum! All of the articles in Wikipedia should stay neutral, so any kind of political propaganda can't take place here. Theodosias

Just a remark for the end: He promised ELECTIONS after CONSTITUTION ... No it is CONSTITUTION and then ELECTIONS Since there is no political power to make new constitution because of political disagreements, we haven`t seen ELECTIONS ...

And so it is endelss loop :-) Typiccaly for him, maybe this should became a famous quote, next to "I wasn`t informed" ... :-)

user:Rastavox

This is very, very, badly written and politically biased article.

First of all, the article is much too abbreviated. If it only contained dry bigraphical facts it should be longer (it's still basically a stub). There's a lot of material worth noting on Kostunica - he's been in politics for 15 years and had a long academic career prior to that. As it is, the article is short on undisputable facts and long on clumsy phrases that are hard to classify as clearly biased but are nonetheless meaningless and insignificant. Stylistically speaking, the article is atrociously bad. When I have more time, I'll expand it a bit. Zvonko 8:18 9 January 2005

Kostunica is definetly NOT an incompetent prime minister (or president, when he was one). Truly, he does take things a little slowly, but he managed to minimize the hatered the political parties has towards each other. Just because he doesn't appear on TV every time something happens (like Tadic, who just craves attention like a little child) doesn't mean he does nothing. He didn't insist on handing over Milosevic because it means that the country has become submissive to every whim of the great Western powers. He didn't go on demonstrations because there are some people who will not cause chaos just to attract attention and benefit from it(like Vuk Draskovic).

Since when was Kostunica of Montenegrin descent?! He comes from an old Belgrade family.