Talk:Vote for the Worst
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not sure why there's a references and sources tag on this article. References are cited throughout the article. I'd like to remove the tag unless there's discussion and disagreement here. I just don't see how the tag is relevant to the article as it now stands. Thanks! Moncrief 14:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
That being said, on a further look, the eight cited references are not showing up at the bottom of the page, and the "History of VFTW picks" is shocking unencyclopedic and POV and should probably be deleted until the POV adjectives can be taken out. The whole section is POV because what was the "best VFTW" performance/moment of a season is totally unverifiable and POV. A Wikipedia embarrassment! Moncrief 14:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] In need of clean up
This page has a few problems. I had heard about this website on the radio and came to this article to learn about it. Right now, it is really in bad shape. I agree that the "Best VTFW" cannot verified and is a matter of opinion. Remove it if you so desire. Perhaps one of the people who created the article should work on the cleanup. As it is now, it's not even close to Wikipedia Standards. --Cyrus Andiron t/c 15:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- A few problems? Understatement of the year. Moncrief 15:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] work to be done
I agree the page needs work! Deleted the remarks on Dave Della Terza sexual orientation for that is not relevant to the article. That would go on a Dave Della Terza article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.232.78 (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Written like an advertisement?
I don't see it. In what way is this written like an ad? --Stacecom 15:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone said it was an ad. I mentioned that the article is very poorly written and in need of cleanup. --Cyrus Andiron t/c 14:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] cannot be accessed
As of 12:30 The Site cannot be viewed, at the moment reasons are unknown, if you are aware of the reason please post it in the TALK page and not the main article —BYMAstudent (talk • contribs) 16:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Citation
There needs to be uniformity in the citations used... there is a mixture of external links and links to internal footnotes.
[edit] Howard Stern
Would this, http://howardstern.com/archive.hs?h=1028, be a good cite for Howard Stern talking about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.252.45.197 (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] ???
Would this be a good line: The contestants the website supports are technically not any better or worst than the others, but are usually the ones who they believe are the least likely to win the majority support of the mainstream public.
? It seems POV. Elle Bee 18:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category
I've removed "Practical Joke". This isn't a practical joke by any real definition of the term and the category isn't relevant here.--Isotope23 13:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
