Talk:Vulnerable species
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Listing By Order?
Although sorting the lists of vulnerable species may be more scientifically sound, does it really make it a better article? It doesn't make it particularly "user friendly" for individuals without a basic taxonomic understanding.
Crydwyn 9th Oct 2006
Request to any of the more experienced Wikipedia editors: Add, or let me know how to add, wiki links automatically. This page can needs links to the animals listed.
Arunan 11th Oct 2006
Also, agree with Crydwyn on the sorting. I don't think the current sorting is technically sound too, it lists random orders from different classes. Even if we have to use a taxon, I suggest Class instead of Order. Arunan 11th Oct 2006
[edit] Kiwi
The Kiwi article says that the Kiwi fits under this category but isn't listed on this list. I have no idea where to add it, but somebody else can.
[edit] Human Race?
Even though many of you would dissagree to this and that the human is very common, I think it should be added to the list. This is due to the vulnerability of the human race due to its lack of natural defenses, constant fighting, and even the possibility of humans eliminating the entirity of the human race (Examples: Bio-terrorism, nuclear halocaust, global warming). If we humans do not fall into this category specifically, then we should still be added to a list to explain our vulnerability to ourselves and other species with a lack of technology. Eiyuu Kou 18:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
