User talk:Waggers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Welcome to my discussion page. -- Waggers.
|
|
|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 |
Contents |
[edit] British Isles
Hi. I meant to say something the other day and I forgot. You said on the BI talk page that I seem to want to include every reference I can find.. I don't want to include "every" reference, and there are a ton more on the page that eric (i.e. not me) put together that I didn't try to include although they say much the same thing. Also, please note that about a week ago I opposed the kind of text I'm now proposing since I didn't believe there was sufficient reference to support it - until eric pointed out that there was a whole page of refs available. In the context of a seriously disputed piece of text I do want to include the references that are relevant and that come from a variety of sources not only Irish or UK ... to try (apparently unsuccessfully) to avoid having the refs called Republican POV or something - which has happened repeatedly on this page. I also want the text to reflect the available reference. Sorry if I'm being pedantic, but the page has been the source of so many POV accusations that sticking to (and having) references seems the only way of keeping the page at all reasonable. Hughsheehy 17:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hi. Thanks for the reply. The issue with the BI page at the moment is that many editors don´t seem to be reading the references...just rubbishing them. Hughsheehy 10:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Prepare for the mop
You're going to get it any minute, good luck and I hope you become a successful moderator. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 02:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- And here it is. Congratulations, with nearly unanimous support, you're now an admin. Spend some time on the admin reading list and make sure to ask questions if you're unsure. Other than that, I'm confident you'll do well, jump in and help out with the backlogs, keep up the good work, and again congrats. - Taxman Talk 03:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- You've got the swagger (which is what come to my mind when I see your name), congrats. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 05:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hey there. The first thing I'd suggest is try to remove underscores when you copy and paste links. "John Doe" looks much better than "John_Doe". Or you can mask the link, e.g. [[John_Doe|John Doe]] :-) BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 16:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- You've got the swagger (which is what come to my mind when I see your name), congrats. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 05:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cheerful comment
you idiot! the change i made to Tsunade (Naruto) made sense because that character has no dub voice actor yet and i was simply correcting him by erasing the name under VA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.75.234.42 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 1 April 2007.
- Datestamp for archiving: Waggers 08:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:`.Thirty Thr33
Normally I would have come and asked first but you didn't appear to be around. I have unblocked and then reblocked that user. It's an abusive sockpuppet of User:Burgz33 who is blocked for a month. The guy just won't learn. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Just thought and came back to tag the above section with a header and a unsigned template. Some people remove them but I just leave them, such as this one. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Highlands Hospital
Dear Waggers, you seem very concerned to nail Enfield Primary Care Trust as associated with the end of Highlands Hospital. Whilst the PCT doubtless has numerous sins on its head, it was not involved with the demise of Highlands. The PCT was founded only in 2001/2, and was not a successor of the Enfield Health Authority which was closed down in 1996. It is a quite separate organization, with very different powers and remit to the Health Authority. Best regards, --Smerus 12:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] templates
have it your way. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Admiinship is no big deal (talk • contribs) 12:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC). Datestamp for archiving: Waggers 21:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:Badbeat30
I reviewed this account's contributions and found they were 100% vandalism. As a result, I've extended your 24 hour block to indef. I hope you don't mind. Rklawton 20:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- The rule of thumb I use is that if it's a new account with more than four edits - and all the edits are vandalism, than it's a "vandalism only" account, and there's no harm in an indef block. Actually, it's pretty rare for an established user account to start vandalizing articles. You'll see them pop up in AIV from time to time, but it's usually a content dispute and not appropriate for AIV. At some point I'd like to create an AIV "decision tree" for discussion. Keep an eye open on the AIV talk page around May some time. Rklawton 21:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: WP:AIV report
Here is the Apr 4th diff where the vandal IP was given the final warning prior to my warning for today's vandalization. Then on that same day, Martin bot reversed an edit by this IP.
My analysis of this IP is that it is a persistent vandal which has been blocked twice in the past. A majority of its edits are being reverted. Sorry you don't share this view. Ronbo76 15:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- (See User talk:Ronbo76 for my reply) Waggers 15:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Concerning the message you left on my talk page.
He had already received a final warning. About a minute after the final warning Martinbot stuck an automated message on his talk page, but the final warning was still there. Could you strike out or remove the message on my talk page? Thanks. -Mschel 15:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- (See User talk:Mschel for my reply) Waggers 15:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- I replied to that mesage on my talk page. -Mschel 15:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Southamptonmap.png
I like your map of Southampton, although I think it would be useful if you add source information to it. Thanks. Edward 16:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Southampton Districts (again)
Hi again, I'm rather hoping we can sort out the districts of Southampton once and for all. There are at least two in the list I'm dubious of, and some more that we could maybe add. Once we've got the list sorted, would you be willing to re-draw your diagram map to match these divisions? Please join the (currently nonexistant) discussion on Template_talk:Districts_of_Southampton if you would like to contribute. Thanks AlanFord 18:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
