War correspondent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section may contain original research or unattributed claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details.

A war correspondent is a journalist who covers stories firsthand from a war zone.

1 Methods
2 History
3 Notable war correspondents
4 See also
5 External links

[edit] Methods

Their jobs require war correspondents to deliberately go to the most conflict-ridden parts of the world. Once there they attempt to get close enough to the action^{[citation needed]} to provide written accounts, photos, or film footage. Thus, being a war correspondent is often considered the most dangerous form of journalism. On the other hand, war coverage is also one of the most successful branches of journalism^{[citation needed]}. Newspaper sales increase greatly in wartime and television news ratings go up^{[citation needed]}. News organizations have sometimes been accused of warmongering because of the advantages they gather from conflict. William Randolph Hearst is often said to have encouraged the Spanish-American War for this reason. (See Yellow journalism)

Only some conflicts receive extensive worldwide coverage, however. Among recent wars, the Kosovo War received a great deal of coverage, as did the Gulf War^{[citation needed]}. Many third-world wars, however, tend to received less substantial coverage^{[citation needed]} because global audiences are often less interested^{[citation needed]} and the conflicts are also far more dangerous for war correspondents^{[citation needed]}.

[edit] History

Written war correspondents have existed as long as journalism^{[citation needed]}. Before modern journalism it was more common for longer histories to be written at the end of a conflict^{[citation needed]}. The first known of these is Herodotus's account of the Persian Wars, however he did not himself participate in the events. Thucydides, who some years later wrote a history of the Peloponnesian Wars was an observer to the events he described.

The first modern war correspondent is said to be Dutch painter Willem van de Velde, who in 1653 took to sea in a small boat to observe a naval battle between the Dutch and the English, of which he made many sketches on the spot, which he later developed into one big drawing that he added to a report he wrote to the States General. A further modernisation came with the development of newspapers and magazines . One of the earliest war correspondents was Henry Crabb Robinson, who covered Napoleon's campaigns in Spain and Germany for The Times of London. William Howard Russell who covered the Crimean War, also for The Times, is often described as the first modern war correspondent. The stories from this era, which were almost as lengthy and analytical as early books on war^{[citation needed]}, took many weeks from being written to being published^{[citation needed]}.

It was not until the telegraph was developed that reports could be sent on a daily basis and events could be reported as they occurred that the short mainly descriptive stories of today became common^{[citation needed]}. The continued progress of technology has allowed live coverage of events via satellite uplinks. The rise of twenty-four hour news channels has led to a heightened demand for coverage^{[citation needed]}.

Early film and television news rarely had war correspondents^{[citation needed]}. Rather they would simply collect footage provided by other sources, often the government, and the news anchor would then add narration^{[citation needed]}. This footage was often staged as cameras were large and bulky^{[citation needed]}. This changed dramatically with the Vietnam War when networks from around the world sent cameramen with portable cameras and correspondents. This proved damaging to the United States as the full brutality of war became a daily feature on the nightly news^{[citation needed]}.