Talk:Westland WAH-64 Apache
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The picture is not accurated, it doesn't display the FCR.
I've added one that does. --Bob the Pirate 21:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
So.., the British Army buys a 'copter with the designation "Longbow", and the first thing it fires on is French? We should have seen that coming...
- - Astatine 10:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Firing on French targets is our speciality! :D David 15:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] better
This Helicopter is a cut above the American counterpart; Its speed is quicker, has more arnament and its power output is higher due to its superior Rolls-Royce built engines.
- That may be true, but you can't just claim that. You have to have reputable sources, otherwise it is considered original research, and that is not allowed on Wikipedia. -- BillCJ 00:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kamov
I seem to recall reading in either AirForces Monthly or Air International that Kamov actually proposed - although perhaps not with a 100% degree of officialness? - the Kamov Ka-50 to the British Army as an Apache alternative. Anyone else remember anything about this? - Aerobird 19:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apache AH1?
The article mentions an AH1 here In British Army service the Apache AH1 will replace the Westland Lynx Anti-tank helicopters ... Is this the MoD's designation for the 'copter or something? If not that should be AH-64 or WAH-64. Thanks. -Fnlayson 20:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is indeed the MoD's designation. The "Apache AH Mk. 1" or "AH1". WAH-64 is just the type name. For example with the Hercules, while its "name" (actually the US designation) is C-130, it is designated Hercules C1/C3/C4/C5 in RAF service (depending on variant). Mark83 21:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I didn't see that explained in the article. Would adding a sentence like this: WAH-64 is designiated "Apache AH Mk. 1" or "AH1" by the UK's Ministry of Defence. to the lead be a good idea? -Fnlayson 21:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've added it to the intro. I wasn't really sure where to add it, if you would prefer something else feel free to change it. Mark83 21:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- I put that in its own sentence at the end of the lead. Edit that if I messed up something. -Fnlayson 22:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, looks better to me. Much better in fact! Mark83 22:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)