From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47b3a/47b3a2e685e7beff041f3d11bd15ce5805a30078" alt="WikiProject Physics" |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
This article fails to explain what a "wet electron" is. It also fails to explain that the term "wet electron" is not a universal term, but referred to in a small number of papers referring to certain electron molecule interactions. Some evidence is required before the wet electron = saddle point argument can be made. The link to this article from Saddle point should probably be removed until this article is clarified. --pflodo 14:29, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
- Just confirming it isn't actually a hoax: [1]. Pretty obscure though. Rd232 22:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Here's the actual reference the webpage above refers to: Science, 308, 1154 (2005). I haven't read it but I will try. Jas131 11:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)