Talk:Wifey's World
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page was previously nominated for deletion.
Please see prior discussions before even considering re-nomination:
|
[edit] Edit War
I've been watching this, and that's it. No more. Normally the procedure is to protect on the 'wrong version', i.e. whatever version it was at when we got fed up, but in this case, due to the living persons policy, I'm protecting on the version with the least personal info. Go to dispute resolution or talk here, but I'm tired of seeing you people mindlessly revert. --Golbez 20:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
From VVVZ ~ December 27, 2006 First, Thank you Golbez for "locking" this version. I was one of those responsible for the regular editing of this Wikipedia entry because of the very personal information constantly reposted over and over. And I do hope that the Wikipedia management consider either permanently locking this entry - or permanently removing it for the privacy and personal safety issues it compromised. Thanks again Golbez, VVVZ 19:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)VVVZ
- Is there a way to delete the history? If security and privacy are a concern, then the history should be wiped out. I was able to go back and find previous versions of the article that had links to a news story with their real names in it. 3D jonny 13:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Should the names go in the article or not?
Looking online, I was able to find the couple's real names on the second page of Google hits for "Wifey's World". As the owners/performers of a popular pornographic website, these are public personalities. And their names have already appeared in their local paper, online and otherwise. Is there a real reason for not including the names here? The trouble with their neighbors may not be relevant to this website, but the names of the stars would seem to me to relevant. Brianyoumans 00:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think I have somewhat changed my mind after reading WP:BLP and thinking about this issue. I propose a compromise: leave the names out, but leave the other facts in, and the newspaper reference - but without a web link. If people want to look it up and find the names, that's fine, but we won't be providing them. Would that work for everyone? Brianyoumans 04:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Seems most appropriate to me. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
