Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assess/2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
List of RahXephon media
List of RahXephon media. Might not be a Featured List until more of the episodes get their own articles. But is it A-class? (self-nom) --GunnarRene 03:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well this is more complete than List of Excel Saga media is and I like the layout. For completeness sake, maybe the release dates for certain things such as the Guide books and Art books could be included in the list. Other than that I think it meets all the criteria. I only checked one image for fair use but I assume that they are all reasonably tagged. --Squilibob 06:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Done. --GunnarRene 16:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Now listed at WP:FLC--GunnarRene 02:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
RahXephon
RahXephon (self-nom). Pending some tweaks and additional information for the Legacy section, as well as a copy-edit by the league of copy-editors, I don't think this is ready for Featured Article just yet. All the rest of the article is stable. The only real change from the peer review was a reordering of the sections. But is it A-class? --GunnarRene 14:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Meets all the requirements. I agree that it is A-class. --Squilibob 00:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed.--SidiLemine 09:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Madlax
Madlax has been added as an A-Class assessment. --Squilibob 01:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Fullmetal Alchemist
Fullmetal Alchemist has been added as an A-Class assessment. --Squilibob 01:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- It has been demoted to a B-class assessment. --Squilibob 06:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Naruto
Naruto has been added as an A Class assessment, but is it? --Squilibob 09:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'd say not quite. There are a couple (citation needed) spots that do sound like they could use a reference. The character section could also be split up as is normal, to avoid it being such a large block of text. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 12:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I concur that it's not up to snuff. There's no real criticism, and it focuses almost exclusively on the anime. Hardly "fairly complete" as required by the assessment scheme. I have assessed it as B-class.--Monocrat 14:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
