Wikipedia:WikiProject Harry Potter/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quality: FA-Class | GA-Class | A Class | B-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed

Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unassessed

Welcome to the assessment department of the Harry Potter WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Harry Potter related articles. The article ratings are also used within the project to aid in recognising excellent contributions, identifying topics in need of further work as well as within Wikipedia as a whole.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPHP}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Harry Potter articles by quality and Category:Harry Potter articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WPHP}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPHP|class=X|importance=Y}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Harry Potter articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Harry Potter articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Harry Potter articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Harry Potter articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Harry Potter articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Harry Potter articles)
• NA (for pages, such as templates, redirects or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Harry Potter pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Harry Potter articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the priority parameter:

• Top — Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia. (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Harry Potter articles)
• High — Subject contributes a depth of knowledge. (adds articles to Category:High-importance Harry Potter articles)
• Mid — Subject fills in more minor details. (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Harry Potter articles)
• Low — Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial. (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Harry Potter articles)

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status after peer review, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further editing necessary, unless new published information has come to light.	Wayne Gretzky
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article as much as the existence of reputable sources allow it. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from the "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. No editors involved in the writing of an article should self-assess their article at this level. Best venue for achieving this class is to request a Peer review	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject as much as the existence of reputable sources allow it. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Linus Pauling
GA {{GA-Class}}	The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but being a Good article is not a requirement for A-Class.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	Bob Marley
B {{B-Class}}	Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, NPOV or NOR. With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Alfred Hitchcock, Ales Hemsky, Joshua Toulmin
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a table. For example an article on Queen Elizabeth might cover her personality well, but be weak on back story. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article NOTE: This is not a negative grade. There are no negative grades in Wikipedia. Having an article on Wikipedia is a passing grade, since it has to pass Notability. This grade is here to alert editors of articles that need some improvement to reach B-class	Not useless. Some readers will find what they are looking for, but most will not. Most articles in this category have the look of an article "under construction" and a reader genuinely interested in the topic is likely to seek additional information elsewhere.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article usually isn't developed enough for a cleanup tag: it still needs to be built.	A. J. Croce, Aaron T. Beck
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. NOTE: This is not a negative grade. There are no negative grades in Wikipedia. Having an article on Wikipedia is a passing grade, since it has to pass Notability. This grade is here to alert editors of articles that need some improvement to reach Start or B-class	May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Oei Tiong Ham
Needed {{Needed-Class}}	The article does not exist and needs to be created.