Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Georgia (country)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
WikiProject Georgia (country) is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on the country of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | ||
[edit] Georgia (country) discussion from Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals
- Description
- for the nation of Georgia, the only Transcaucasus nation not to have its own project
- Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
- Chris 08:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Josephseagullstalin 03:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC) YEAH!!! GEORGIA IS AN AWESOME NATION!!!!! IT HAS A RICH HISTORY AS A POST SOVIET STATE!!!!!
- (although I'm not sure I'll be much use where creation of content is concerned) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 16:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Euskera 19:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC) I can also help out with History and culture info. Thanks.
- Aivazovsky 22:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC), I'm very interested in Georgian history.
- Geagea 14:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC) very interested in georgian relatied articles, and trying my best to put them mostly in the hebrew wiki.
- KoberTalk 06:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Now that Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) is running, how about one for the country Georgia? Chris 22:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Before I create it, how would you like it named? Chris 16:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Issue with the main template
The main "this article is part of WikiProject Georgia" template seems to keep articles in the unassessed and unknown-importance categories even after they're assessed. I'd mark the ones I've found manually, but then they'd be in two categories by assessment which would start to get a bit messy. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect that it's the same with the importance, in that the template will keep them marked as "unknown-importance" even if someone assigns an importance value. By the by, I've nicked the Greek project's assessment scale and set it up as ours (why Greece? Tamta was an article I tagged). It may well not be the best way of setting things up, but at least it's going to give people a vague conception of standards until something else comes along. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
