Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia as a court source
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A list of court citations has been compiled. --Michael Snow 21:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Leaving a note on article talk pages
I think it is interesting for editors to know that an article has been cited in a court decision, especially by appellate courts or courts of last instance (but probably less so if the citation is in amicus curiae briefs, parties' motions etc.). I've starting leaving the following sort of notice on the relevant Talk pages:
 |
This article was cited as a source in a U.S. court decision, English Mountain Spring Water Co. v. Chumley, 2005 WL 2756072 (Tenn.Ct.App., October 25, 2005). See Wikipedia as a court source. |
What do you think? Sandstein 19:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Is this supposed to be for citations of the English language Wikipedia only?
Which would be a shame, since at least in the German-speaking countries there have been a number of decisions by senior judicial bodies that have quoted the German Wikipedia. They don't (yet) seem to collect those citations in de:, though. Sandstein 20:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, this is the English wikipedia, so I think we should limit ourselves to citations of the English version. Feel free to create a similar page in German Wikipedia and add interwiki links, though. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] US citations
Tech Law Prof Blog on June 19, 2006 said that Westlaw gives 20 citations of Wikipedia by US federal courts, one in 2004 but mostly in early 2006, compared to 105 for Encyclopedia Brittanica. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] United States vs. Muhammed Salah and Abdelhaleem Ashqar
On October 24, 2006 in the Federal District Court for Northern Illinois, Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Ferguson asked the government's expert witness Matthew Levitt "Have you heard of wikipedia?" and "Do you consider it a reliable source?" Ashqar's Defense attorney, Bill Moffet, objected and Judge Amy J. Steve sustained the objection. It's not known how the prosecution intended to use wikipedia as evidence. Bjd773 12:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Does this count?
http://www.citizen.org/documents/ACFDB9C.pdf is a "certified complaint" in Nickolas v. Fletcher, et al. It mentions "blogs" a little ways in, but I don't know if it's legit. 68.39.174.238 01:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
