Talk:Win-win game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merging
I don't think the articles win-win-game and win-win-strategy should be merged. The term win-win-strategy deserves more attention but it shouldn't be reduced to a game strategy. Many real-world strategies and procedures could be modelled with terms from game theory or related theories. In this case I think that would reduce the possible (not necessarily the current) scope of the article. --Fasten 15:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree. I don't think they should be merged either. I think someone should expand the current entry of a win-win-strategy. It is critical for successful negotiations and it deserves to be expanded. 30 September 2006
NO merging of these two as per Fasten.
Trade2tradewell 13:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe it would be better to create a 'win-win' concept page, leading then to games theories, strategies and so on pages, separatedly. 150.217.27.186 11:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, that's a good idea. I was thinking similarly, that win-win game could be a disambiguation page between zero-sum game and win-win strategy. Maybe the latter should rather be merged into principled negotiation, but that should be discussed there. — Sebastian 00:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
