Talk:Winemaking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Wine Portal Winemaking is part of WikiProject Wine, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of wines, grapes, wine producers and wine growing regions. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page where you can join the project and find other ways of helping.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale within WikiProject Wine.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Wine open tasks Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Wine: Article request: Wine tasting descriptors, List of local wine enthusiast organizations in the USA, red links on List of champagne producers, red links on Spanish wine regions Expand: Aligoté, Appellation d'origine contrôlée, American wine, Cabernet franc, Chilean wine, Chenin blanc, Gewürztraminer, Malbec, New World wine, Penfolds, Pinot blanc, Soave (wine), South African wine, Trebbiano, Vouvray (wine), Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a wine guide Cleanup: Table wine, Wine competition, Wine tasting Articles to FA: Riesling Articles to GA: Wine, Australian wine,Burgundy wine, Champagne (wine), Grenache, Pinot Noir, Rioja (wine),Sparkling wine,Tempranillo Peer review:Tempranillo Copyedit: Aligoté, Cabernet franc, Chenin blanc, Malbec, Pinot blanc, Rioja (wine), Tempranillo Photo request: Penfolds Grange, Beaujolais, Aligoté, Malbec Collaboration: Operation stub-killer, Nominations for top level importance Wine Improvement Drive: Sauvignon blanc Infobox: Template:Infobox grape variety, Template:Infobox Winery Other: Comment on the grape article template and on the grape infobox. view • edit • discuss • history • watch

Contents 1 Page history 2 Move to wikibooks 3 Rewrite 4 Edits 5 External links 6 Merger Discussions 6.1 Wine production 6.2 Field blends 6.3 Riddling 6.4 Chaptalization 6.5 Volatile acidity 6.6 Unoaked wine 6.7 Pigeage 6.8 Winemaker

[edit] Page history

This article was a step-by-step instruction to make wine, apparently titled How to make wine. See August 14, 2004 version. The VfD discussion is included for historical purposes:

The step-by-step instructions were moved to Wikibooks in February 2006, after which the article was replaced by a stub, on March 21, 2006.

[edit] Move to wikibooks

Hmm, given that it was not VfDd in the past, not sure about this. We need an article here, its just not this one. Sure you can have this content on wikibooks if you like. Will try to do a start of a real article sometime. Justinc 23:04, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite

Today I rewrote the article from scratch. Han-Kwang 22:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits

I'm going to try and do a little bit of clean up, as well as fix a couple errors over the next day or two. I'll see what I can do about adding a little more information about the process without straying into the how-to and if I get time, a picture or two. The Bethling 18:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

A persistent anonymous editor insists on adding Winemaking At Home to the external links section. I've removed it three times; another individual has removed it once. There may have been earlier attempts to include this link. I've reviewed the external links guide and have two reasons for removing this link; It doesn't add any value to this article and it is likely link spam. Please discuss here before placing this link back in the article. Gregmg 04:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

---

I'm removing this:

• http://www.pressedforwine.com Pressedforwine.com--Extensive winemaking information!

Although the site doesn't look too spammy, I don't think anonymous editors without any edit history should be adding external links. If other established editors think this is a good resource it can be put back. Han-Kwang 16:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger Discussions

Below is a list of proposed topics to be merged into this article.

Why this flood of merge proposals? OK for articles that are overlapping or have little potential, but quite a few of the proposed articles don't overlap and do have the potential of being expanded to a detail level not appropriate for Winemaking. Han-Kwang 05:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Some, (Wine production, Winemaker) overlap or cover similar ground, most others (Volatile acidity, Unoaked wine, Pigeage) are little more than wiktionary definitions, unlikely candidates for expansion and meaningless outside of a winemaking context... or not, hence the discussion! There *is* a stub-killing drive underway at WP:WINE which might explain why there's so much activity on these fronts of late. mikaul^talk 13:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wine production

Is there any reason why Wine production and Winemaking shouldn't be the same article?--HarryHenryGebel 04:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Information should be referenced in Wine production article before merge. That article seems to be written by a single editor. ◄scharks► 05:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• support. Although it's the nightmare of an editor to spend a lot of time in an article, only to discover that the article already exists with a different name. Anyway, there are a lot of useful facts in Wine production that would be valuable here. (Disclaimer: I wrote most of this article) Han-Kwang 14:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Support The concepts of both articles are essentially the same. No need for two separate articles. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• SupportFlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support per resons above ~ mikaul^talk 13:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support The subjects are essentially the same, they need to be in one article. Wine making is the more mature article, and (I think) the more common terminology.-- Siobhan Hansa 13:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Field blends

Field blends might be more appropriate in Viticulture?? FlagSteward 02:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

In hindsight, I would agree and a support a merge to Viticulture. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 02:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support merge to Viticulture. It's not really a part of the wine making process, more a grape growing decision. ---The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Support the viticulture merge ~ mikaul^talk 13:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose the viticulture merge. The viticulture article is basically about farming. But field blends are about the make up and balance of the wine. As the articles sit now, field blends fits more into winmakign than into viticulture. No opinion on merging into this article - I don't think it's a bad idea, I'm just wary of how long this article might get with all the additions. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Riddling

I would oppose both this and the Chaptalization merge. Both of these items have history and encyclopedic content that can be added. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 02:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose a merge to this article. Riddling is really not a general wine making process, it's unique to a specific form of Sparkling wine production. I would support merging it to methode champenoise though. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• I'm sure I've heard of people riddling still sur lie wines, but I guess that the principle of least astonishment would put it in methode champenoise. Having seen that article and the way it already duplicated most of the riddling article, I would support a merger to that article rather than here.FlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd Support a move to Champagne production - the section there would benefit from the small amount of extra info. mikaul^talk 13:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd support a merge to Champagne production - appears to be a better home. Such a small article is probably better merged than left as it is. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose merge to winemaking, support merge to champagne production. -Amatulic 19:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chaptalization

• Oppose as above with Riddling Agne^Cheese/^Wine 03:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose Chaptalization is a controversial subject whose legality varies depending on the jurisdiction (Legal in France, illegal in Italy. Legal in Oregon, but illegal in California. Only legal for some wine classifications in Germany.) There's a great deal that can be added to the article and can be improved to the point where it can stand on its own. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support Just because it's banned in certain jurisdictions doesn't mean that it's not a mainstream winemaking technique. The legality shouldn't affect the decision to put it in this article or not. I'm not convinced that there is enough for it to stand on its own - and being a 'joiner' rather than a 'splitter' by instinct, I'd rather see it merged. Then if you're right and there is so much information about chaptalization in this article that it becomes unwieldy, then it can be split out again. If I'm right, then this article is more comprehensive and we've lost a stub.FlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  It is not just a mainstream winemaking technique, but it's a tremendously important one with a huge amount of history and controversy attached to it. In my opinion one of the most encyclopedic worthy topics in winemaking. I can see that Agne agrees and has already expanded the article well beyond stub status, so I think that the argument is pretty much moot now. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 17:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  As an FYI, Bethling is right. :) I'll probably put this article up for GA in the near future. Simply too important and large of a concept to try to shoe horn into this article. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 19:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support as per FlagSteward. This is the case with all of these merges; if we assume more info "might one day" be added, there would never be any non-overlap merges at all. mikaul^talk 13:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• I disagree with the idea of not thinking about what an article can expand to. The ideal merger candidate is a stub that can never really expand past a stub. It's far easier to expand an existing stub than pull information about a topic out. Merging topics that can be expanded dissuades editors from adding information that may not be relevent to the topic it was merged into. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 17:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support Until the section is expanded, it's better folded into larger article. Oppose after Amatulic's comment I went back and looked again It appears to have been substantially developed today (2007-04-05) by Agne27. I don't have the expertise to evaluate it, but assuming the additions are good it is now too big to be well integrated without losing substantial content. I suggest others who expressed an opinion earlier go back and take another look. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. The chaptalization article is already detailed enough to stand on its own. This winemaking article should have a brief paragraph on it with a link pointing to the main chaptalization article. -Amatulic 19:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Volatile acidity

• Oppose This is a property of the wine itself, and really isn't overly related to the winemaking process. Not sure where it could be merged to. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Would support a merger into Wine though?FlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• After thinking it through, I think Wine Fault is the best place for the merge. There's already a section on acetic acid that mentions V.A., I think renaming that section and then merging/redirecting to that section makes sense. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 23:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Conditional support I'm not sure this is at all relevant to wine itsef: I'm fairly sure it's a test performed on the must during the winemaking process. If not and it can be shown to be relevant to the finished product, I'd have to withdraw this and oppose any merge to any article, due to it having more than one definitive use. mikaul^talk 13:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Volatile Acidity is a measure of specific acids that are present in the wine. Typically it's acetic acid, but there are a couple others than show up. They're all strong tasting and smelling and if present in any sort of non-insignificant concentration ruin a wine. Winemakers will test for it, because it's a major fault. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 23:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

There's a good article from Wine & Spirit mag that might help people - if the VA article looked like that, then there'd be no need to merge :-) FlagSteward 21:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unoaked wine

• Support Basic winemaking decision. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support mikaul^talk 13:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support It would be hard to even refer to it in this article without saying more than the standalone article contains. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pigeage

• Support Historical winemaking term. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support FlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support mikaul^talk 13:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support -- Siobhan Hansa 13:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Winemaker

• Support for the same reason as Wine Production. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 03:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• SupportFlagSteward 11:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support - thinking about it, some of these might link to other topics and I'd suggest they were merged leaving a divert directly to their own (short) section on the Winemaking page. Comments? mikaul^talk 13:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Reliance on redirects to sections of an article can be frustrating for readers when the article isn't very stable. Ideally we'd look at all the wikilinks to these terms individually and decide whether to link to winemaking, link to a section within winemaking or delete the link. (But that might be quite a lot of work :)) On the whole I think the actual redirects should go straight to winemaking itself. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support -- Siobhan Hansa 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)