Talk:World domination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Judaism
Judaism was previously listed as a proselytising, universalist religion in this article. I have removed that reference, as in the Judaism article it says they are merely open to sincere converts, thus they do not proselytise. --Haridan 07:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
The last major forced conversion to Judaism was before the common era, and didn't turn out to well- Herod was one of these converets. (I forget who it was exactly, possibly the moabites.)--Lophoole 21:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 09:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Global domination → World domination Using Google today, September 29, 2006, I have found the following:
- "Global domination" = 856,000 hits.
- "World domination" = 5,400,000 hits.
I am therefore moving this page to the later.
- Ludvikus 10:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I've just "Googled" World Domination Recordings, and here's the result:
- Results 1 - 10 of about 3,050 for "World Domination Records". (0.29 seconds)
- PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE MADE MY RECOMMENDATION ABOVE, ON THIS DISCUSSION, ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2006. No one responded! Didn't the time expire already? Do we really have to wait(e) any longer? Isn't it obvious that the correct usage is World domination? And by the way, I've also noted that the article has NO REFERENCES!!! Yours truly, Ludvikus 08:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
Support - I'll believe google. Beardo 23:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- Please note: World domination links here, but World Domination used to link to World Domination Recordings, until I changed it a few minutes ago. I think this is important, if we're worried about a disambig page. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 08:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- TIME (since 9/29/6) EXPIRED, I BELIEVE. Accordingly please MOVE page NOW! Ludvikus 08:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- But it wasn't posted at WP:RM, so there's no way people would know that you placed a request on the talk page. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 02:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- TIME (since 9/29/6) EXPIRED, I BELIEVE. Accordingly please MOVE page NOW! Ludvikus 08:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ONE MONTH WAITING FOR THE PAGE TO BE MOVED
- Please note that it has been ONE MONTH since my initial survey and recommendation that the page be moved! Accordingly, please move page forthwith. Ludvikus 08:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Was the request placed on Wikipedia:Requested moves ? -- Beardo 23:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
where should it have been moved to/from? --Lophoole 21:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ideologies?
"Many proselytising religions such as Christianity and Islam" - what other ones are there? Aside from the fact that there are very few such religions apart from those two (making "such as" inappropriate), one cannot say "many" if there are only so few. elvenscout742 13:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I think the authors wanted to avoid listing all religions that actively recruit converts and also to avoid internal disputes among religions as to whether or not it is legitimate to recruit converts (as such debates are ongoing in some religions) (RookZERO 02:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Section to be deleted
"Future world domination" seems to speculative to be accurate, and the suggestion that some states/nations may want to take over the world seems POV. Also, many of those "threats" do not seem credible. --Lophoole 21:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
