Talk:Yitzhak Rabin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
Yitzhak Rabin is part of the WikiProject Israel, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Israel articles. |
|
Project Israel To Do (Drop-Down Menu):
|
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale. |
Words from David Rutstein. I actually know the Amir family. Geula Amir, Yigal's mom really well. As well as Barry Chamish really well. I am the one who built www.BarryChamish.com and www.YigalAmir.com. In fact, all email from both sites go to me. Email from Barry's site gets forwarded to Barry as well.
The first month of Yigal Amir's arrest, Yigal denied doing the murder. After some friendly persuasion he was all into blaming the Rabbis and admitting everything. I am not sure what was discussed, money and threats. But that is what happened. Yigal will never show remorse because he did not do the murder. The evidence is really overwhelming. The video of the murder is now online and even in that video you can see weird things happenning. Look at the back passenger door of the limo close from the inside. There was a fourth person in that limo. Israeli TV showed the 10 minute video of the murder, "the Kempler video", for one week in 1996, and has not shown the video since. In fact Yigal played an exaggerated non-defense in which he seemed to want to get convicted. This exagerated desire to be convicted seems weird and will cause Yigal eventually to be freed because anybody who studies the case realizes that Yigal shot blanks. End of comment by David Rutstein.
The quote was obviously added to put Rabin in a negative light - see the site that is linked to it, it is a propaganda site. Besides, there is no point in leaving it here since its merely a description of Ben Gurion's actions and gives no insight on Rabin's opinions or ideas. I'm replacing it with a more appropriate qoute. --Yunis 21:44, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
All I can say about this article is that it is far too short. Unfortunately I am not qualified to really write anything longer without substantial research. There are many people out there who are qualified however. The Six-day war in particular was an event of far reaching consequence in which Rabin played a pivitol role. The Oslo process was also very significant historically. Rabin is a major historical figure and his Wikipedia page should reflect this. --Wtmgeo 00:12, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Last paragraph is doubtful. Someone please NPOV it. --Cema 08:08 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)
sure this article could be longer now it's as long as Yigal Amir article!!
- I agree, the article is painfully short. Worthy extensions: more on the assasination, it's immediate influence on Israeli society and politics, as well as long lasting effects on the peace process.
I think the title of the square where the assassination occurred was (before its renaming to Rabin square after the assassination) Kings of Israel Square, but I'm unsure. --Penta 21:13, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The bone-breaking quote is taken out of context. This was during the first intifada, the first wave of violence against Israeli's by Palestinians in the occupied territories. Palestinian kids would throw rocks at Israeli soldiers and civilians, Rabin said something like "If you throw rocks, we'll break your arm". That is an important context.
Contents |
[edit] Kempler video
What about that video link the owner of yigalamir.com (I don't understand a word from the site, but some here say it's propaganda?) keeps adding to various Wikipedias? Can it be considered linkspam or is it worth keeping? (And even if it's worth, it does look like an illegally published TV capture which Wikipedia shouldn't link to, doesn't it?) --Glimz 23:21, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Hello Glimz, at the Dutch Wikipedia we do not connect to media unless it is located at the site of the copyright owner. But we also do not claim "fair use" for pictures... What is the policy here with respect to media-files? The movie is an interesting document which could be linked under the murder of Yitzhak Rabin. The site however should only be linked from its conspiracy equivalent. gidonb 03:21, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- The policy/practice throughout Wikipedias (AFAIK) is roughly "don't link to illegal archives". Requiring the site to be the copyright owner is too restrictive as it won't allow linking to collections/aggregations of (usually copyrighted) open content by various authors (Wikipedia is one itself, by the way, as are most open content/source projects). --Glimz 05:07, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
-
- Glimz, thank you. It was also my impression that en.wikipedia is somewhat more flexible than nl.wikipedia in copyrights matters. This is why I did not delete all links to the Kempler video here. I did delete them at the Dutch Wikipedia however. At he.wikipedia the video also does not get linked, I think more because of the extremely bad taste of blaming a minister and a security service for murdering the prime-minister. Regards, gidonb 10:25, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- You can now go to the page in wiki english Kempler video page which explains scene by scene exactly what happened in the Kempler video... There were forces that tried to delete the page but those evil forces did not succeed--Kempler video 05:07, Aug 26, 2005 (UTC)
No more running for Knesset, now walking around Israel, especially Jerusalem with a sandwich sign that reads "the killers are free" "kempler video" "10 minutes" "there is a fourth passenger in the limosine" "www.yitzhakrabin.co.il" I am recruiting more volunteers.. It should be international news eventually Kempler video --Kempler video 05:07, Aug 28, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] POV pushing
Is there any reasonable explanation why Gidonb and Jayjg would be so serious in deleting references to the Kempler video, now they are replacing the 10 minute video with a 10 second clip from CNN. --Kempler video 010:07, Aug 29, 2005 (UTC0
- Sorry if your commercial interests were hurt, but if you want to push your dot coms please buy banners elsewhere. Even here there are no free lunches. Links to conspiracy sites which include hate speech towards Nobel Prize laureates and many others should only be made from the special conspiracy pages, if at all. Sorry for any inconvenience. gidonb 07:52, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
What does hate speach have to do with replacing the 7 1/2 minute Kempler video with a 10 second clip --Kempler video 010:07, Aug 29, 2005
Hey Gidon and Jayjg, good news, this story is being picked up by international media in the very near future. Shimon Peres called me a "sycko" "that should be institutionalized" so I filed a $50,000 slander lawsuit against Shimon. As well I put big headlines on all my sites that say "Shimon Peres ordered the murder of Yitzhak Rabin". these sites include yitzhakrabin.co.il, yigalamir.com, shimonperes.net, arielsharon.co.il and barrychamish.com (english) Hey guys you have to appreciate my sense of humor. If what I am claiming is false Shimon will sue me and I will look stupid and loose money. But if what I am saying is true.... oy va voy....G and J.. believe me, I am not happy to be correct.. but the preponderance of evidence is really overwhelming...--Kempler videoOctober 5
[edit] References
Why do we have a further reading section (which, by the way, should be above external links according to convention) but no references? Can we confirm that the book(s) in the further reading list were used as sources and thus create a references section like we ought to? Johnleemk | Talk 11:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Photo
We need a higher resolution picture. 70.29.159.91 17:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Concur. I have no clue where to look, but this photo is awful. He was a general and statesman, not a splotchy gnome. Wally 08:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The assasins remarks
I have heard that the first words of the assasin after he was interviewed was "Did the c_ _t die?" I am not sure if it was true, so I didn't add it.
[edit] F-15s?
"Rabin resigned from office after two crises hit him: the arrival of four F-15 jets on Shabbat led to the breaking up of his coalition..."
Can someone elaborate on this? I have no idea what this means or why it is significant.
Omehegan 16:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
The traditional and religious parties, who inticipated Rabin's coalition where angry that the jets came on that day, which is important for the Jewish people. for more information, look for the Judaism article.
[edit] Can we add IPConflict template?
There is a new template for the Israel-Palestinian conflict -- see Template:Israel-Palestinian_Conflict. I'm not adding it to everyone who is involved with the conflict, since the template is large, but I am adding it to key figures. I have added it to Arafat and Abbas. I believe that adding it to Rabin's biography is also appropriate. Thoughts? --Deodar 17:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- support. Amoruso 03:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] name
Why not Izaac? Izhac is Hebrew for that name.
I KNOW ISAA RABIN WAS ASSASSINATED FOR THE REASON OF PEACE, THE RIGHT WING OF ISRAELI EXXAGRATED HIS MISSION OF PEACE ,RABIN IS WRONG DOERS ,THE ARABS TERRORIST GUIDED THE SECOND PROBAGANDA AGIANEST RABIN , WHEN THEY DO MORE SUICIDE ATTACK IN TELAVIVE, RABIN WAS ALONE THE MOMENT OF HIS SHOOTING , HE ONLY NOT BRAVE OF SOLDIER BUT ALSE FATHER OF PEACE , DEVIL SEND THE ONE WHO KILL RABIN
[edit] POV - "Great man of peace"
There is phrase "After the death, Rabin was turned into a national symbol, especially for the Israeli Left as Israel's great man of peace, despite his military career." in which words "great man of peace" seems to be completely POV. I think first the term "man of peace" is controversial and unencyclopedic, not talking about the person being "great" in this controversial role. I changed it twice to more neutral wording, but it was reverted by Nupractor. I think there is no place for such statement, but if you have better wording - you are welcome. My version was "After the death, Rabin was turned into a national symbol, especially for the Israeli Left.", but again, you are welcome to find a better wording. Zigmar 18:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- That pharse expains the way he is widely viewed by the Israeli public (and the government), I don't understand what's the problem. Nupractor 07:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that many people think this (which, BTW, is also POV) does not make it more encyclopedic. It either need to be said in appropriate context (i.e. "Israely left often refer him as great man of peace despite... bla bla") or removed completely in my opinion. In current form it looks like statement (which is ridiculous for encyclopedic statement) rather than a peoples opinion. --Zigmar 13:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that the wording is somewhat problematic, however I disagree that there is no room for citing public opinion, as long as it is presented as such and not as some sort of ‘truth’. How about this phrase:
- After his assassination, Rabin was turned into a national symbol and became to embody the Israeli peace camp ethos, despite his military career and hawkish political history Amirig 23:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above is a biased poltical view. Israeli Jews have sharply differing views about Yitzchak Rabin. The Israeli far left turned him into an icon. The Israeli right views him very differently, in part due to him being in command in 1948 to kill many Jews on the Altalena and those who jumped in the sea by Tel Aviv's shore and because of gross military failures, including multiple collapses under conditions of stress as in key battle during the Independence War and at critical initial stage of the Six Day War (Ref. Dr. Uri Milstein's book on Yitzchak Rabin). A considerable percentage of Israeli public apparently questions the official report about Rabin's assassination and many give credence to the hypothesis that Rabin wanted to back out of the Oslo accord, which may have sealed his fate. Unfortunately Israeli politicians lost credibility in recent times, with two of its last Presidents and four if its last Prime Ministers under police investigation for corruption and other alleged crimes. Ironically, also the police at the highest level was recently under investigation. (Fortunately corruption in Israeli government is at a much lower level than in Gaza and the West Bank, but that is not much of a comparison.) Consequently any report issued by the Israeli government on a controversial issue, such as Rabin's assassination, is viewed by many Israelis as politically controlled and not taken seriously. Although there are considerable doubts about Rabin's final perspectives about possibility of any form of peace with Arabs living in Gaza and the West Bank, there is probably general agreement that Rabin had much higher integrity than the latest crop of Israeli leaders. The Rabin article is highly one sided and needs tobe balanced with facts rather than accolades.Emesz 07:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- You may be right about the article not being balanced (in fact it is quite poor on many issues). However this does not contradict the fact that after his death Rabin was elevated in public discourse (to the dismay of some) as a national hero, and was appropriated by the Israeli peace camp as its symbol (and not merely by the ‘far left’ as you argue). The above sentence refers to that, without arguing whether or not he is in fact a ‘man of peace’. As for the other issues you raise: most of them are highly controversial, and probably describe the views of a very small, albeit vocal, minority. Amirig 07:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
