User talk:Zenohockey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
edit |
Archives |
Contents |
[edit] Part of interwikitmp-grp
Hi! re: Tfd: W2c... This is part of the nascent Wikipedia:WikiProject template sharing, and another two we've never quite dignified with a name or formal write up yet. This is quite useful for refering to commons locations in documentation or templates that need work on all sisters, no matter which sister such is copied too. Such work is too time intensive as it is.
Unlike most sister projects the commons does NOT have an abbreviation which works on itself like [[W:whatever ]]. Ral315 discovered 'W2' is much the same nightmare, and for similar reasons, this one best not be messed with... not to mention all the templates it will break. No reason to create work. Suggest you unnominate it ASAP. Thanks. Best regards. // FrankB 05:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okay... but Ral315 has voted to delete W2c. In any event, the reason I nominated it was that the only textual content was "To be deleted." This, combined with the cryptic name, suggested that the whole thing was an abandoned newbie experiment. I now know this isn't the case, but the discussion that's happening is at least getting your nascent project some popularity; it spurred you to put some documentation and removed the confusing "To be deleted" bit; and the TfD discussion may well generate new ideas.
- Given the lively and not one-sided debate that has emerged, I think I'll decline to unnominate the template. I am sorry, though, if I've inconvenienced your project. --zenohockey 23:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] BKSP
Hi, I saw you marked [1] as ambigious. Why? --Soman 10:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- It actually wasn't that link I was concerned about: it was the link to SDAP, which is a disambig. to four different SDAPs. My initial edit probably made that clearer, but I switched the order of the superscript and the disambig tag because I thought it looked better. I'll go change the order back to clarify the situation. --zenohockey 17:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. --Soman 17:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Help populate novel list?
I'm soliciting assistance in populating the page List of novels by point of view. Would you consider pitching in? Thank you! --TheEditrix2 15:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- When I get the chance, sure, I'll help. (As an aside, this looks like the sort of article that needs strict length guidelines right off the bat [e.g., 10 highly recognizable novels per POV], lest people add their favorite novels willy-nilly, like a "Quotes" section in a Simpsons episode article...) --zenohockey 22:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bush v. Gore
I provided some additional information and a link that may interest you in response to your question at the reference desk. Regards, Newyorkbrad 14:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)