Talk:Zero emission
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Shouldn't it be "no harmful by-products"?
(Section title added by 137.205.192.27 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC) )
Shouldn't it be "no harmful by-products"? I mean, water is still an emission, and if you take an electric motor, that is literally zero emission - except that it does produce heat. I feel like this could be better explained. - IstvanWolf 05:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, I will try to rewrite it. Also, I added a small title section to your comment for future readability of the page. 137.205.192.27 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Separating existing and future technology
I added some information on emissions associated with various forms of current electricity production and added a section for future technology ( such as fusion and CCS ). I suggest we keep the sections of currently widely deployed technologies separate from the ones in the research phase, as it makes it easier to compare the various technologies in an NPOV manner. I realise that the distinction is not always going to be perfectly clear, so some common sense will have to used (ominous phrase, I know). 137.205.192.27 21:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
