User talk:ZINLAW
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, I thank you for your edits, but please see this link for information on Wikipedia's "no original research policy. I thank you for your contributions, but please keep into consideration what type of information is encyclopedic, and which statements need to be supported by outside sources. AdamBiswanger1 01:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I removed sections of the text which I felt violated our original research policy. Feel free to add them back to the text if you are able to prove that they are not simply your viewpoint. AdamBiswanger1 01:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Zinlaw-- I have removed your commentary on Sonnet 141 and moved it to Sonnet 141. Please tinker with the information there so it does not violate any of our policies and guidelines-- namely, ensuring that the information is not original research. If you would like to respond, please write a message here. AdamBiswanger1 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Zinlaw-- please see the Wikipedia article regarding Spam. I see that the book you added has an author with a conspicuously similar name. If this is not you, I apologize, but if it is I must remind you that Wikipedia is not a place to publicize oneself. AdamBiswanger1 02:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Zinlaw-- I have removed your commentary on Sonnet 141 and moved it to Sonnet 141. Please tinker with the information there so it does not violate any of our policies and guidelines-- namely, ensuring that the information is not original research. If you would like to respond, please write a message here. AdamBiswanger1 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)