Talk:Advanced Modular Vehicle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove `\|auto=yes` from this template. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the `\|class=` parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force

[edit] Cost

How much do you think one of these would cost? I cannot seem to find anything about that. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 17:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Well Poland bought 690 vehicles for 1,27 billion Euros and the Finns bought 62 AMV's for 96 million Euros (these were 'simpler' than the Polish ones, lacking the big gun turret and only equipped with a remote operated MG). MoRsE 19:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] name

in the title it's called the "advanced modular vehicle" but in the first line, it's the "armored modular vehicle". which one is it? also, the picture states that it's a "Patria XA-360"; shouldn't the title of the article reflect the apparent official designation? Parsecboy 18:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Patria company calls it "AMV Armoured Modular Vehicle", The Poles refers to their version as the "Rosomak" (AMV XC-360P), and the Finns calls their "AMV XA-360" --MoRsE 19:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Power

Page states that system has 360kw engine, although in one reference (army-technology.com) states 405kw. If there are different models, those should be listed. Tuju 10:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The Patria designation system is linked to the power of the engine, XA-200 has a 200 kW engine, XA-180 a 180 kW engine....the AMV, or XA-360 has thus a 360 kW engine. It could be that they have sized up the engine for the AMOS version as the tower is quite heavy. I will do some research.--MoRsE 10:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/d/v/Talk%7EAdvanced_Modular_Vehicle_6055.html"

Categories: Automatically assessed military history articles | Stub-Class military technology and engineering articles | Military technology and engineering task force articles | Stub-Class weaponry articles | Weaponry task force articles | Stub-Class military history articles