Talk:Archer Blood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Archer Blood is part of WikiProject Bangladesh, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bangladesh and Bangladesh-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not subsitute this template.
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject History of Bangladesh. |
The part of the article that is actually about Archer Blood is fine. I don't see a need for cleanup. But the second part of the page that is about Richard Sklar is off-topic! It needs to have a separate page. I don't see what this is doing in the Archer Blood page!
On Blood, a couple of important pieces of information are not mentioned. He was recalled due to his dissent. And the American consulate library in Dhaka has been named after him. Here are a couple of external links: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43422-2004Sep22.html http://dhaka.usembassy.gov/pre1dec13_05.html
- The Richard Sklar part looked strange to me too, as I hadn't seen it the last time I checked the article. A careful look revealed that some one vandalized the Template:Poli-bio-stub today, and added the text on Richard Sklar. Since the stub text is inserted automatically into every article containing the template, this article ended up with the irrelevant text. I've fixed the template now. Thanks. --Ragib 21:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] does it have credible resources
does this article have reliable references.
actually this is a irrelevant comment on this talk page, but i m surprised if this is true and still bangladesh continues to have excellent diplomatic relations with pakistan.
nids 23:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, these are documents from US Government's state department archives (link provided in the article, which points to http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB79/BEBB1.pdf ). Why Bangladesh *currently* has diplomatic relations with Pakistan is not relevant here. USA and Germany does have excellent diplomatic relations *now* regardless of what happened in WW2. --Ragib 23:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- This is fallacious analogy, Germany and US have diplomatic relation because US defeated Germany and forced a regime change. But we have the same military regime in Pakistan right now that commited bangla genocide. Astavakra 20:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Not realy. --Ragib 01:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
-
