Talk:Battalion Wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
This game has been announced for Nintendo Revolution and needs to be updated. I don't want to cock it up, just thought i'd let someone know.
- Sp. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.203.61.81 (talk • contribs).
Anyone here in the mood to add information on the actual gameplay to the article? This is a game article after all.
- No problem.--Arima 07:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
does anyone else think the long list of units is a bit pointless? Jimbob1630 19:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Could someone give the Link to the Unit List since it was moved? --Arima 05:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Battalion_Wars
I'm not sure about the Reaction section; it's probably POV. -- gakon<sup>5</sup> [[User_talk:gakon5|(talk)]]
Contents |
[edit] Need more info
If one is to place a "Spoiler Alert", the article must have something a person starting a game would not know.
I shall do the honors of adding storyline specific information to the article. Another must take up the task of the actual Gameplay. That is, unless you want this article to remain a dry, barren shell.
-Seurat. (Author of last post.)
[edit] Images?
Why are the images posted as links? Are they copyrighted or something?
--Sam Green 19:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- If I recall correctly those images were added by an anon, who couldn't upload them. If we can clarify the copyright status, we could upload them and have them shown in the article properly. Having said that, we don't want to get carried away adding images of units or we'll have more images then text. -- Steel 19:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've removed them for the time being. -- Steel 19:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speculation
Big chunks of this page are speculation and original research, which is a WP no-no. Espect it to reduce drastically in size shortly. Geoff B 19:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Right, done, which involved deleting entire sections in some cases. Still not happy with it, even with the listcruft, game advice, speculation and OR reduced, but I'll leave it a while, see if anyone else has anything to say. Geoff B 09:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- This game has already been released, how can there be "original reaserch"?
Why don't you find out what original research is before asking how there can be any? Whether the game has been released or not is irrelevant. 09:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Resource management
How is resource management handled in this game? The reason I ask is because I'm having trouble figuring out whether this is an RTS or an RTT (real-time tactics) game. SharkD 18:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
