T
O
O
L
B
O
X
edit |
Welcome {{welcome!}} {{welcome-anon}} {{thanks}} Warn {{test0}} {{test}} {{test2}} {{test3}} {{test4}} {{bv}} {{spam}}
Check {{Copyvio|url=*source}}--~~~~ {{delete}} {{db|...}} {{no source}} {{no license}}
Dispute {{POV}} {{disputed}} {{TotallyDisputed}} {{controversial}} Delete {{afd}} {{cfd}} {{ifd}} {{tfd}} {{rfd}} {{mfd}} {{prod}}
Community Community Portal, Village pump, Wikipedia:RC patrol, Policies and guidelines, WikiProject, Barnstars on Wikipedia, Peer Review, The perfect Article
External bibliographies, HTML to wiki tables Stats Statistics, Sitemap
Main Today's featured article, Selected Anniversaries, Did you know, In the news, Picture of the Day
|
|
[edit] Re: Andres Lopez
There are apparently concerns that some of the content is being copied from his official site; you should really talk to the deleting administrators about this, though. Kirill Lokshin 03:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- You should still be able to see the deletion log, though. Kirill Lokshin 03:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Sealibague.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Sealibague.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fibonacci 03:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Votación...
Le escribo para invitarlo a votar aquí.
Gracias por participar,
--Ricardo Ramírez 22:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Municipalities
Alhamdulillah, i just wanted to say thank you for helping out in the Department of Magdalena article, one of the things that deterred me from esxpanding this, or any article, is lack of pictures or images, i was so glad when i saw that you created a map with the political divisions of Magdalena, im not so savvi when it comes to computer made images or stuff like that but thanks, and please let me know your opinions on this article while im expanding it. mijotoba 14:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh i just had one question, is there anything in particular i need to do if i want to upload the Magdalena map to commons, so it could be used in sister projects? i dont know, since yu are the creator, and yu uploaded them to en.wiki i thought there would be a special license or something....
Hi Mijotoba, Yeap I'll do it.. since I already have the images by file name, it will be easier to upload them. --((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 14:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
What template was this one replaced with? (It is still being used in Barrios Unidos; your nomination has marked the article for speedy deletion as well.) That said, I don't see how the template fits the speedy deletion criteria; you should probably rominate it for regular deletion at WP:TFD. Regards, Mike Rosoft 10:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you need to TFD this? Instead of creating a new one (which looks worse in my opinion), you could have simply edited the old one. Editing the old template so a (slightly smaller) Bogota flag and coat of arms appears on the top is all the improvement it needs in my opinion. Funpika 18:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not all of them are localities of Bogota.. per nom.. and why did I TFD it because a sysop recommended me to do so. -((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 20:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I should have rephrased my first question. My point was that you could have just improved the nominated template rather than try to get it deleted and make a whole new one. Funpika 20:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signatures
But other Wikipedians have images in their signatures. 
Chiss Boy 00:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:COL
Good call on the "How to rate importance" subpage; it's much needed. I think the history and econ things are pretty spot on, but I think we've tended to disagree about the relative importance of geography and department divisions. Admittedly I'm a newcomer to the project, but I feel like a general geographic overview is important insofar as it provides context for understanding Colombia as a political entity. While the project is rightly focused on all things Colombian, the average encyclopedia reader is coming to get either a historical or political perspective on how the country fits into the regional or global picture. Therefore, items that are essential to that understanding should be rated higher, much like a reader trying to understand the USSR would be better served by reading articles about Khrushchev and the Eastern Front (World War II) than Vladivostok. I'm fine rating them top or high, I just think given the massive amount of work needed on basic things, by putting the departments and capitals too high in importance we're skewing the worklist from things that will provide more users with more useful information more quickly. Thoughts?
By the by, I'll probably be contributing less and less over the next few months...I'm going to start working 60-70 hour weeks pretty soon, and that's gonna take it out of me. I'll probably still gnome around, but then I leave Colombia (I use this to work on translation skills and bone up on things I haven't read in on). I'll probably start working more in Arabic starting in the summer, as my goal is to get up to a 3 in Arabic by next April. Hopefully I'll have time to do the contributing I want to! Hwonder talk contribs 23:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I love the new Bogotá template...much better! Hwonder talk contribs 03:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for making me screw up
Don't put a CSD tag on a template that is going through a TFD. Such a move is a blockable offense. —Pilotguy cleared for takeoff 12:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Antioquia
Why did you revert my edit to Antioquia? As I stated on the article's discussion page, I have simply moved the municipalities section to their own list, so that it wouldn't clutter up the article, and linked to the new list from the main article. Ygoloxelfer 18:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I tried to do too much too early. I've moved the section back in, and also added a short geography section using information adapted from the Spanish wikipedia. Ygoloxelfer 18:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for improving the municipalities section - it looks a lot better than just having the basic list, which is what I was trying to avoid. Ygoloxelfer 11:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wiki Boxes
Hello. Thank you for the hints on my page by the way. How would I create or place user boxes on my user page?--Zombiema7 02:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Inirida
Please take the time to comment and intervine in the process of moving the page Puerto Inirída to Inirida see Talk:Puerto Inírida for further info. mijotoba 04:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I stumbled across the pic Image:Iedcontrolledexplotion.png that you took a few months back. It's a really stunning pic and it can probably survive the Featured Pic process. However, it's over 12mb large in png format. Do you have it in jpg format at high res? I can convert it, but that might create unnecessary jpg artifacts. Tell me either way, so I can convert it or wait for a better version from you. =D
Oh...and did you go deaf after that explosion?!? It couldn't have been good to your hearing. ;) Jumping cheese Cont@ct 07:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Pic converted: Image:IED Controlled Explosion.jpg. It turnned out much better than I though it would...it's only 2mb now. Please add in any info like location and the surrounding circumstance. =D Jumping cheese Cont@ct 04:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries when creating pages
Hey, I was just patrolling new pages and I noticed you just created quite a few new stubs. I have no complaint about the articles themselves; however, there is one thing I'd like to bring up about your use of edit summaries. This is really no big deal, but when you use an edit summary like "Created" when starting a new page, it's actually less helpful than if you have no edit summary and just use the automatic "Created page with 'This is the '''contents of the page'''. Lorem ipsum...'." The automatic summary obviously isn't the best edit summary you could have, but it's better than just "Created". If you want your own edit summary, something such as "Created new stub on a town in Colombia" is more descriptive and better fits the purpose of an edit summary. Again, this is just a minor concern, but it would be helpful if you remembered this when creating pages. Thanks, Pyrospirit Flames Fire 04:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikify San José de Suaita
You put a wikify template on the San José de Suaita page. What do you suggest should be done? There are lots of internal links and the article seems fairly well structured. — Graf Bobby 09:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chocó Department
Thanks for providing a citation in the Chocó Department article about it being created in 1944 without the proper legalities. It is too bad that your source is only a magazine article and only says the same thing "sin cumplir los requisitos legales". Do you have any idea what was missing? --Bejnar 15:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the info. That's alright about accidentally using my user page. What map? --Bejnar 22:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Very nice map, Chocó Department Map, Colombia (InmoColombia). Are you doing a location map of municipalities for Chocó? --Bejnar 22:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Inírida, Guainía
Thanks for finding a better solution to the name of the Inírida, Guainía article. I have always used the accented version, but mijotoba assures us that the accent has now been eliminated. I notice that the [Inirida municipality web page] does not use the accented version. Of course this is the same user who assures use that Inirida is a city. --Bejnar 17:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
