User talk:Kellyunderwood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
kju is currently on vacation in real life from 13 March 2007 until 30 March 2007 and may not be able to respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome!
Hello Kellyunderwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 16:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Nury Vittachi
Moved Vittachi to Nury Vittachi. Actually, 100% certainly seems like a consensus to me. :) In cases as straightforward as this, a listing at Wikipedia:Requested moves isn't really necessary anyway: any logged-in user can move an "obviously" wrongly titled article, provided there's no clash at the move target. Alai 16:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Of course, I'd forgotten about that restriction! It's not really designed to stop "newbies" as such, but is a recent measure to try to thwart a certain notorious page-move vandal. Keep making those vital spelling corrections, and you'll be "in good standing" in no time, and able to make all the moves ypu like. :) Alai 04:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Zabriskie picture
The thing is, Frank Steele is already attributed - as is his right of course - in the Image:David zabriskie portrait.jpg page. I have no real qualms about it, it was just a reflex deletion as it looked like selfpromotion. So this seems like a good compromise :) Poulsen 13:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stuart O'Grady Photo
I NEVER gave my permission for my copyrighted photo of Stuart O'Grady to be used. I only rececived an email telling me that you were using my photo. Sorry, but I am not giving you permission to use any of my photos, ever. Do not repost my photo. Do not use any of my photos, period. - Alden Tanaka
Kelly says: He probably shouldn't have used the Creative Commons license on his photos then. Fixed! Quite a pity really, because it is a great photo.
[edit] Supreme Court image
If you are really the copyright holder, then please change the license of the image at the source (Flickr), such that it is compatible with WP license (BY or SA). The source of the file is still not compatible. It is now CC-BY-ND-2.0. If you don't change this license at the source, then I have to revert back your image license to the same license as the source. — Indon (reply) — 02:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CSC/Puerto
I just think you forgot to close the ref again, with a </ref> tag, and the ref didn't stop until the next </ref> tag, at Cuesta's ref. I think the Puerto article is a little messy, some subsections might be a good thing, plus it has refs in that one section header, which should be cleaned. Poulsen 11:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- That sounds good! I tried reading through a few refs but couldn't find the exact facts needed myself. Poulsen 13:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lotto et al
I've been doing research, which is quite difficult due to the lack of English language sources, but I have been using the websites Cycling4all and Cyclingnews, to try to trace them back. Cycling4all is very good, but I don't think it qualifies as a reliable source so haven't referenced it. Anyway, as I understand, Lotto-Domo was a new team in 2002, mainly built upon Lotto-Adecco, and using a lot of Domo-Farm Frites staff and riders too. I think because they were different teams they deserve their own articles. I think we need a wider debate on when teams qualify for new articles - I'll start one at the Project talk page... Mk3severo 00:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Changed the infobox on the Robbie McEwen page to the new one - slight change of picture order, please do revert the pictures if you feel it's better. I also started a discussion on how team pages should look here. Mk3severo 01:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UCI press releases
UCI press releases always seem to be final - until two weeks later when a new final one is issued ;) Remember during the summer/autumn that the UCI said that Active Bay would have a ProTour licence and that Astana had no chance after missing a deadline? I think we'll just have to see when it all shakes out! Mk3severo 12:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- The news sites say that Fuerteventura-Canarias (which is based on the set-up of the old Communitat Valenciana team), Aurum Hotels (which used to be Naturino-Sapore Di Mare) and Team L.P.R. (or whatever it will be called having merged with Team 3C Casalinghi Jet Androni Giocattoli, the team of Davide Boifava) applied for licences but did not receive them (they only speculated why, there isn't a strict limit on the number of ProConti teams). Also I'm confused with what has happened to the Miche team - they seem to have just disappeared as none of the news sites have anything about them and they don't have a licence! The only thing I can think of is that they have something to do with the Tinkoff Credit Systems team... Very strange Mk3severo 02:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Team CSC
I don't think it was a good idea to remove all the individual references to riders entering or extending their contracts, they contained additional information (such as what the riders and teams expectation were) that might be of interest the reader.--Per Abrahamsen 11:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Effingham
I think you removed the stuff from this page and put it elsewhere. I'm just not sure if maybe there needs to be a link on the page directing the reader to it. I couldn't see one. I may quite well have missed it and admit I wasn't up to wading through all the talk page. SuzanneKn 21:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
