From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b72d/4b72dc500626d0cd9b1d0705fbf0dd711540ad92" alt="Famicom style controller" |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
CVG To-do:
- Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor
- CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft
- Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks
- Merge:
- Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines
- Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)
|
What concern does the editor have about advertising? They've not expressed themselves very clearly.
- Agree. If people don't like an article, they should point out exactelly what's wrong with it, or fix the damn thing themselves. This article sure could use more "meat", but given the amount of games that Retrospec has developed, IMHO it is more than notable enough to deserve an article! - Stormwatch 17:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- It could do with rewriting since it does seem mildly like an advert at the moment in the sense that it seems to laud Retrospec. The notability thing I think is nonsense - Retrospec clearly aren't an obscure group - but there needs to be a constant vigilance on this site against editors tagging anything they (or the overly US-centric internet and therefore Google) haven't heard of as "non notable" --Zagrebo 10:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)