User talk:Sborsody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Sborsody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Wikiacc (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Doshpuluur
Hi. I see that someone has imported your fine GFDL article here from tyvawiki. I was wondering if you could confirm that the image you uploaded there is also under a free license. Thanks.--Pharos 07:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Magyars
Thanks, ussually hungarians like to inflate their numbers. They ussually add also the minorities. --Eliade 17:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- The general practice in math is to round the number up despite what hidden nationalistic motives anyone may have. Since you wanted to get into a reversion war with KissL I stepped in with the citation from the 2001 Hungarian census. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 19:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for digging up the exact number. KissL 17:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Why you made that irony Kiss? --Eliade 17:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Altaic?
Hi, The main problem is related with the "(disputed)" tag, cause this leads misunderstanding. There exists Altaic Languages but there is going on discussion about Altaic thesis. This "(disputed)" tag causes the misunderstanding that "--- language's being Altaic is disputed". For this reason, i'm supporting to remove the "disputed" tag. The discussion should be done either in the Altaic Languages page or maybe better in the Altaic hypothesis page. e104421 3 September 2006, 20:15 (UCT)
[edit] Central Asia
If you are interested in adding to articles about Central Asia, please join WikiProject Central Asia - we would welcome you. Aelfthrytha 12:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hakozen and Huns
Please help improve his poor edits to the article, not just comment on the Talk page, if you have the time. I might hit 3RR, but it's obvious that there is community opinion against him, I just need other people to show up and act. CRCulver 23:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can after dinner ;) --Stacey Doljack Borsody 00:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- The sentence you inserted back is a pov style sentence (reflecting the opinion authors of the references), i paraphrased it in order to make article more neutral. E104421 17:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- The sentence is a quote from a source. Quoting sources does not make the article itself POV. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 17:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Yes, i'm not claiming so, but better to paraphrase. E104421 17:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Huns
Have you ever read the contents of the link pages? 18:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not the one including Attila to the list. If his name stays in the list, the see also link is appropriate. For the Xiongnu article, there exists a section related with Huns. I just wondered why you really insisted on removing Xiongnu. We can discuss the issue in more detail if you want. Sorry, maybe because of the language barrier, i wrote so direct. What i want to say is the article related with Xiongnu contains material related with Huns. The see also links does not have to be directly related with the article itself. They just provide additional topics. That's it. Regards. E104421 21:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of Turks
I've noticed your engagement in List of Turks. Taht article is - like most of the Turkey-related articles - flooded with POV. I've removed a few names that have nothing to do with Turkish people (see [1]) - but the article still contains countless POV claims.
Tājik 21:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Tuva
The change of the name seemed a tad suspicious however, I will assume good faith. Have you proposed this name change on the talk page by any chance? If so then I have no problem with it.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually no need to check back I took a look at Talk:Tooruktug Dolgay Tangdym myself. Thanks for proposing it first and my apologies for any hard feelings.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dingling
Hi there. I just wanted to drop you a note. You said you were frustrated by the reversions of the "main editor" of the Dingling article. There's an official Wiki policy on "ownership" of articles: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. I'm going to drop a hint on the talk page of Dingling and see what happens. In the meantime, if you don't want to wrestle with blockheads, there are plenty of other articles that desperately need help. Thanks for writing. Cbdorsett 05:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)