User talk:Persian Poet Gal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do Not Forget to Sign: ~~~~ After Your Message!
- Remember to sign all comments with four tildes (~~~~) at the end!
- Be patient in waiting for a response.
- Be civil. Any uncivil comments will be deleted, no exceptions.
- If you have sent me an email and I have not responded yet feel free to drop a note here.
- If you do not receive an answer on your talk page, check back here to see if there is a response.
For those who are IP editors or newly registered users and cannot reach me during times of semi-protection, try my unprotected talk page located @ User talk:Persian Poet Gal/Non-protected.
User Page Contributions Talk |
I archive every 50 messages. So if you have recently left a message for me and do not see it anymore on my talk page, feel free to look through the archives below to view my response. |
Contents |
[edit] sorry
hey im sorry for vandilizing i wont do it again. I didnt know.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.18.66.101 (talk • contribs).
[edit] A Cat For You!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a0f/75a0fed76c140e830f56c46e7c8410d17d9a80f0" alt="This cat says:"Thanks! Have a good day! Oh, and DTD says hi too! :)"."
-
- Cats ^_^...¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Personally, I like dogs better...but cats are quite nice too! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Da.Tomato.Dude (talk • contribs) 18:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
-
-
-
-
- Dogs are also quite fine creatures, but you shall not change my MIND...CATS WILL EVENTUALLY RULE THE WORLD...BOW DOWN TO THEM NOW MORTAL! MUAHAHAHAHAHA...¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- *hides behind computer monitor* Uhh...maybe responding wasn't such a good idea...(not)(listening)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- *cackles insanely* Ooops. Did that come out again?(not)(listening)
-
-
-
-
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I found two possible sockpuppets of User:Danny Daniel
They are Choolabuuulba (talk • contribs) and Booooomerang (talk • contribs). Squirepants101 23:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Unfortunately I cannot log on at the moment but I will examine the suspected socks when I have the chance. You can always post them on WP:ANI too, so another admin can get to it sooner.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I took your advice and put this issue at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Choolabuuulba_and_User:Booooomerang._Sockpuppets_of_User:Danny_Daniel_and_User:Choolabuuula yesterday, but no admin has responded to it and Choolabuuulba still appears to be editing. Squirepants101 19:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Illustration request
Hey there Poet! I was roaming around Adrenal gland and noticed some problems with an image from http://training.seer.cancer.gov. Having seen your past work on Image:Nervous system diagram.png, I was wondering if you had any interest in redrawing it. Let me know if you're interested and I can send you some specifics. Cheers, David Iberri (talk) 13:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Great to hear from you again Diberri! This week is slightly busy for me but I think I might be able to do something within the month of April or May. Since you are quite an expert with correcting the accuracy of these medical illustrations, I need to know what exactly may be some key things that need correction in a new image. One more thing I would suggest is to present an image change on the talk page and contact some of the editors of that article you know. That way if I do get around to constructing a new image, most people would agree with changing the one already posted on the article. Pleasure chatting with you!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Persian rug gal
Is this person a spoofer on your name? They signed up yesterday. Acalamari 21:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism perpetrated by User:Gary Kirk
Hi PPG, I am here to report that the aforementioned Gary Kirk has recently been making several peronal attacks against me, plus generally making a nuisance of himself (refs [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] plus changing my userpage image from a photo taken by my dad to this). After the first of them, I said:
- Hi Gary - I am disgusted that a vandal such as you (ref. [8]) is still prepared to get all self-righteous over cases like mine a few months back. Get off Wikipedia, we need fewer people like you. --Vox Humana 8' 13:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page - please assume good faith and don't make personal attacks. Thanks. Gary Kirk [Talk] 12:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have also replied there. --Vox Humana 8' 17:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page - please assume good faith and don't make personal attacks. Thanks. Gary Kirk [Talk] 12:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
After the most recent of these, I replied with the following:
- Gary, I have tried to assume good faith here. However, your recent vandalism to my userpage ([9]) and the photograph thereon ([10]) has greatly reduced my trust in you. I shall appeal to have you blocked for a few weeks - hopefully, that will be enough to teach you a lesson about making personal attacks.--Vox Humana 8' 22:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Meanwhile, a few months back, he criticised your unblocking of me in the following manner:
- Hello PPG. I would like to know the reasoning behind your recent unblocking of EccentricRichard. As you can see from his contribs, he was extremely disruptive, did not let policy get in the way of his edits, and generally was not a good editor. I question whether your unblocking was appropriate, straight after Yamla declined his request. Richard has in the past said he will do things and went on not to honour this. With the sockpuppetry too, I feel an indef block is necessary. Thanks — Gary Kirk // talk! 16:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
This all seems very strange. His contributions show many recent constructive edits - he attributes the problems to having his account hacked or somesuch excuse, but, to be entirely honest, I don't know whether or not to believe him. I certainly think that it would be a good idea to block him until Monday so that he can take time to stop hackers accessing his account. However, I have to assume good faith, so it may be that I'm being harsh to him in saying that. I'd like to see what he has to say on the subject.--Vox Humana 8' 23:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cnes logo.jpg
hey do you think you could delete my image for me? we have found a better CNES logo to use! (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cat_anatomy_diagram suggestions
In your otherwise lovely diagram on the Cat page [[Image:Cat_anatomy_diagram.png]]:
-
- The Urethra label points to the small intestine, instead of the tan tube exiting the bladder. A dot at the end of the arrow is useful for diagram labels.
- The labels are blurry in the main article thumbnail. Can you enlarge the font? WP serves the whole image for the browser to scale, and browsers (esp. Opera) blur text in images when shrinking them.
- If you don't have the original file anymore, nevermind.
- --Lexein 13:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Thank you for your support to my recent successful RfA. PS did you know that the admin task tracker, which is on your userpage and which I pinched from User:Gwernol does not update? --Anthony.bradbury 14:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)