Уикипедия:Бұзақылық
Уикипедиядан
Үлгі:Editabuselinks
Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.
The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of bad jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism is usually easy to spot.
Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding a personal opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.
Committing vandalism is a violation of Wikipedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt with — if you cannot deal with it yourself, you can seek help from others.
A 2002 study by IBM found that most obscene and page-blanking vandalism on the English Wikipedia is reverted within five minutes (see official results); however, vandals persist as a problem for all users, and it is a good idea when editing an article to check its recent history to see if recent vandalism has gone unnoticed. In addition, the popularity and readership of Wikipedia has skyrocketed since the 2002 study, and there are no recent data corroborating the "five minute" expectation.
Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism; careful attention needs to be given to whether the new data or information is right, or false but well-intentioned, or outright vandalism.
Үлгі:Associations/Wikipedia Bad Things
Мазмұны |
[өңдеу] Dealing with vandalism
Edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person may not be vandalism, but instead an effort by the subject of the article to remove inaccurate or biased material. Even when such edits are inappropriate, they should be treated as content disputes, not vandalism. In particular, vandalism warning messages should not be left on the talk page of the editor.
If you see vandalism (as defined below), revert it and leave a warning message on the vandal's talk page using the system below. Check the page history after reverting to make sure you have removed all the vandalism; there may be multiple vandal edits, sometimes from several different IPs. If it is obvious that all versions of the page are pure vandalism, nominate the page for deletion. Also, check the vandal's other contributions — you will often find more malicious edits.
[өңдеу] Warning templates
Note that these templates need not be used sequentially. If the edit is clearly vandalism, consider using {{blatantvandal}} or starting with {{test2}}. For continuing severe vandalism, {{test3}} may be skipped and a {{test4}} given straight after a test2. If, however, you are not sure that the edit is vandalism, always start with {{test}}. For extreme or extensive cases of vandalism committed by users with who have received no prior warnings, {{test4im}} may be used. The ~~~~ in the templates below cause the time and your signature to be added to the warning.
- UNIQ726ee6d63dbe4280-nowiki-00001BA4-QINUtest}} ~~~~ (use if an edit appears to have possibly not been an intentional act of vandalism)
- Уикипедияда тәжірибе жасағаныңызға рахмет. Сынықтамаңыз жұмысын істепті, және сосын қайтарылды немесе аластатылды. Енді тағы басқа сынақтар үшін жоба құмжашігін немесе өз құмжашігіңізді қолданыңыз. Біздің энциклопедияға қалай үлесіңізді қосуын үйрену үшін кіріспе бетін қарап шығыңыз.
- {{subst:blatantvandal}} or {{subst:testblatant}} or {{subst:bv}} ~~~~ (use if an edit is clearly vandalism)
Үлгі:Blatantvandal
- {{subst:test2}} ~~~~
- Үлгі:Test2
- {{subst:test2a}} ~~~~ (a variant suitable for vandalism that consists of blanking text)
- Үлгі:Test2a
- {{subst:test3}} ~~~~
- Үлгі:Test3
- {{subst:test4}} ~~~~
- Үлгі:Test4
- {{subst:test4im}} ~~~~ (used as a first warning for extreme cases of vandalism)
- Үлгі:Test4im
Alternatively, you can use:
- {{subst:test-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:blatantvandal-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test2-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test2a-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test3-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test4-n|PageName}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test4im-n|PageName}} ~~~~
to explicitly state which articles were vandalized (suffix -n stands for named) and to add your signature. For example:
- {{subst:test-n|France}} ~~~~
- Үлгі:Test-n
Additional warning templates are listed here.
The "subst" causes the template text to be pasted into the talk page as if you had typed it out, instead of leaving {{subst:test}} visible when editing the page. This makes the messages more personal to the user, and thus, more friendly. Also, if someone vandalizes the template, then the vandalism will not affect every page that uses the text from the template.
If the vandal strikes again, list them at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. The blocking admin leaves this on the vandal's talk page:
- {{subst:test5}} ~~~~
- Үлгі:Test5
You may also write your own message to the user. Remember to sign and timestamp your warnings by leaving four tildes (like this: ~~~~).
[өңдеу] Trace IP Address
Also, consider tracing the IP address. Find owners by using:
- ARIN (North America)
- RIPE (Europe, the Middle East and Central Asia)
- APNIC (Asia Pacific)
- LACNIC (Latin American and Caribbean)
- AfriNIC (Africa)
(If an address is not in one, it will probably be in another registry.) Then add {{vandalip|Name of owner}} to the talk pages of users who vandalize.
If an IP address continues to vandalize and is registered to a school or other kind of responsive ISP, consider listing it on Wikipedia:Abuse reports. Follow the instructions there and read the guide to see if it applies. If it does, list it.
[өңдеу] Types of vandalism
Wikipedia vandalism may fall into one or more of the following categorizations:
- Blanking
- Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit.
- Spam
- Adding inappropriate external links for advertisement and/or self-promotion. Note that this applies only to placing links on numerous and/or unrelated pages. Adding self-promotional links to a few related articles may be inappropriate, but is not vandalism.
- VandalBot
- A script or "robot" that attempts to vandalize or spam massive numbers of articles (hundreds or thousands), blanking, or adding commercial links. Another type of VandalBot appears to log on repeatedly with multiple random names to vandalize an article.
- Childish vandalism
- Adding graffiti or blanking pages.
- Silly vandalism
- Creating joke or hoax articles, replacing existing articles with plausible-sounding nonsense, or adding silly jokes to existing articles is considered vandalism.
- Sneaky vandalism
- Vandalism which is harder to spot. Adding misinformation, changing dates or making other sensible-appearing substitutions and typos.
- Attention-seeking vandalism
- Adding insults, using offensive usernames, replacing articles with jokes etc. (see also Wikipedia:No personal attacks)
- User page vandalism
- Replacing User pages with insults, profanity, or nonsense (see also Wikipedia:No personal attacks).
- Image vandalism
- Uploading provocative images, inserting political messages, making malicious animated GIFs, etc. Repeatedly uploading images with no source and/or license information after notification that such information is required may also constitute vandalism.
- Abuse of tags
- Bad-faith placing of {{afd}} or speedy-deletion tags on articles that do not meet such criteria, or deceptively placing protected-page tags on articles.
- Template vandalism
- Any vandalism to templates. Examples include blanking the template, adding an image to the template which is unrelated to its use, et cetera. Edits which cause a template to display improperly are not vandalism if the mistake was unintentional.
- Page move vandalism
- Moving pages to offensive or nonsense names. Wikipedia now only allows registered users active for at least four days to move pages, and the reason must be stated.
- Redirect vandalism
- Redirecting articles or talk pages to offensive articles or images. One example is the autofellatio redirect vandal. Some vandals will try to redirect pages to nonsense titles they create this way. This variation is usually performed by vandals whose accounts are too new to move pages. It is also often done on pages that are protected from moves.
- Link vandalism
- Rewriting links within an article so that they appear the same, but point to something completely different or ridiculous (e.g. France).
- Avoidant vandalism
- Removing {{afd}}, {{copyvio}} and other related tags in order to conceal deletion candidates or avert deletion of such articles. Note that this is often mistakenly done by new users who are unfamiliar with *fD procedures and such users should be given the benefit of the doubt and pointed to the proper page to discuss the issue.
- Random character vandalism
- Replacing topical information with random characters, or just adding random characters to a page. "aslkdjnsdagkljhasdlkh," for example. Be careful: only in extended cases is this vandalism; it could also potentially be a new user test.
- Changing people's comments
- Editing signed comments by another user to substantially change their meaning (e.g. turning someone's vote around), except when removing a personal attack (which is somewhat controversial in and of itself). Signifying that a comment is unsigned is an exception. e.g. (unsigned comment from user)
