Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Log 4

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2007

[edit] Serkan sarioglan

Many of the contributor's articles on villages can be fixed for the gazetteer, but I would draw the line at local football stars! Blockinblox - talk 15:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete not notable enough. Ksbrown^talk 21:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete Yeah, I have to agree. He really is not notable enough for wikipedia simple english. --Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 02:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. · Tygartl1^·talk· 14:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I think besides not being notable; it's also NPOV. --Eptalon 15:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2004

Page is not needed. This is the only Month, Year page remaining after all others from the time period were merged into the year page. 2004 already has 18 entries for the month of March. Such detailed daily news updates for the month are not needed-- Creol(talk) 16:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete as long as the information is fairly covered on the 2004 page. Tygartl1 17:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete Per above. --Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 18:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I will delete it as soon as someone lets me know it's been merged. Blockinblox - talk 15:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Merged--Werdan7^{T @} 21:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kanbearer

It may be a hoax. There are no hits on Google, Yahoo, or en.wikipedia. Wodup 05:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete either a hoax or badly misspelt. --rimshot^talk 09:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete This article is clearly a hoax. --Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 18:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - definitely seems like nonsense. By looking at the contributor's other edits, it seems they are not a serious editor. Tygartl1 15:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lang-a-bang

It may be a hoax. There are no hits on Google, Yahoo, or en.wikipedia. Wodup 05:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete either a hoax or badly misspelt. --rimshot^talk 09:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete Again, this is clearly a hoax. --Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 18:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - definitely seems like nonsense. By looking at the contributor's other edits, it seems they are not a serious editor. Tygartl1 15:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Prettytable

As far as I know, {{prettytable}} was used on English Wikipedia before the wikitable table class was created. I'm guessing this template on this wiki did the same thing. It's not used in any pages at the moment, and we don't need it because we have the table class, so there's no reason for keeping it. J Di 03:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Result was delete. J Di 09:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete as per nomination. Ksbrown^talk 19:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete as stated above --rimshot^talk 21:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. --Werdan7^{T @} 23:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete, as template is not in use anymore. :)-- Tdxi a n g 04:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:DuckTales, Template:Disney direct-to-video animated features, Template:Darkwing Duck

The 'DuckTales' template is pretty much useless. It is not being used on any page. There is not even a page for DuckTales, and the only character whose page is created (Donald Duck) doesn't really have a large enough role on the show to use the template.

The 'Disney direct-to-video animated features' template is also useless. Not a single movie listed has a page. They're just taking up space.

Sidenote: some of you may remember the user a while back who was creating all sorts of Disney movies simply by copying and pasting from en:wiki. This same user created both templates. They may have linked to pages that have been deleted, and as such no longer serve a purpose.

Regarding Template:Darkwing Duck, it's made by a different user but is equally pointless. It appears to also have been made by a user who liked to copy and paste from en:wiki. Tygartl1 15:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete Donald may get lonely without a template (that he isnt even using), but looking at the template, he has no friends anyway so this is nothing new to him. Neither template is needed at this time, and should they ever become needed, they are direct copies of en:WP templates that could just be copied over (again) when the time comes. -- Creol(talk) 15:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete these remains of a page-creation spree that was bordering on vandalism anyway. --rimshot^talk 16:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - Delete the Darkwing Duck template as well (as per nom.) --rimshot^talk 08:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete Sorry Donald. Ksbrown^talk 14:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Result: Deleted. PTO 01:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject

This project doesn't need this page, it has been decided at least once that we don't need WikiProjects yet, and this page has said that it would be updated for the last 14 months (I know neglect is not a valid reason for deletion). J Di 23:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Result was no consensus. J Di 12:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete - We don't have enough people to merit a Wikiproject. PTO 00:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment Isn't Wikipedia:Esperanza a Wikiproject? --rimshot^talk 13:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is according to en:Wikipedia:Esperanza but, if I'm right, it's also the only WikiProject. J Di 13:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Keep, change will be updated to currently the only wikiproject on simpleWP is Esperanza. I think even if there is only one such project, it makes sense to explain what a wikiproject is. --rimshot^talk 13:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep The reason why I am voting weak keep is per Rimshot. Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 15:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - not of requirement. Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 19:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Redirect to Wikipedia:Esperanza until there are more wikiprojects.--Werdan7^{T @} 22:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete as there is only Esperanza. Ksbrown^talk 14:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
'Keep' There will be more wikiprojects in the future, so just add a link to Esperanza onto the page... Nancysing 04:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of municipalities of Switzerland

I propose to delete this list. Yes I know, enWP has it too. The problem I see is however a different one:

It is 88k in size, and of doubtful value
Some info on it is clearly wrong. (Abtwil is in the catnon of St.Gallen, right next to St.Gallen; not in Aargau).
Some town names are more popular than others. There are 2 Affoltern in the canton of Zürich; there are a few Altstätten (SG), Altstetten (ZH), for example.

I do not think that we currently have the knowledge or time to proofread this (given our limited resources. For Switzerland, it would be a start if all 23 (26) cantons were there, and all their capitals). --Eptalon 22:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Result was delete. J Di 14:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete - for the reasons given --Eptalon 22:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I concur. Browne34 02:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Reason: doubtful value: (1) It has hardly any value as navigation aid, as most municipality articles aren't there anyway. (2) Its value as reference is diminished by it being available in enWP and not very precise. --Rimshot 10:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete There is no value to this article. --Sir James Paul ,La gloria è a dio 15:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I don't see that it's harming anything, even if it isn't all that useful. However, if the content is incorrect as you say it is, it should probably be removed. Cantons of Switzerland already exists, although in the form of Canton, which is incorrectly defined as a state in Switzerland (the term "canton" can also refer to a state in a few other countries). I am going to make 'Canton' a disambig page and move the info that's currently there to 'Cantons of Switzerland'. I think at this stage in Simple's development that this is a good level of detail on the divisions in Switzerland. We just are not ready for the detail that the 'Municipality' page calls for. Tygartl1 16:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Update: I have created Cantons of Switzerland and made canton a disambig page. Tygartl1 22:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

As stated above, it would be a good start to have one page for each of the 23 (actually 26) cantons, and one page for the capital of each. This already makes 52 articles (most of which are not there). If then we get 2-3 other cities per canton that leaves enough playground for people to play with, and is most probably faster to do than to correct the list above. --Eptalon 19:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Blocked

Unused template that I don't think has any practical use. The user pages of temporarily blocked users aren't blanked and replaced with any templates, and {{block}} is more suited to informing users of blocks because it tells them how they might get unblocked. J Di 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Result was changed. J Di 13:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment I cannot say whether this template should be deleted, but I do think that {{blocked}} is more visually appealing than {{block}}. --Rimshot 12:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Change from temporary block to indefinite (simplified to permanent or forever) block and use like w:Template:Indefblockeduser. Wodup 06:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Change - agree with Wodup. Assuming this RfD is still open, sorry if not. FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 19:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Gribbenov

I cannot find anything about this supposedly important person. I have also looked for Gribenov, Griebenov, Griebenow, Gribbenow. Looks completely invented to me. Rimshot 18:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment There is a references to this very person in Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, which was added by the same IP address. This should probably deleted as well if the RfD goes through. --Rimshot 18:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete, a Google search for the name returns no hits outside of Wikimedia projects. J Di 18:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete - No source, no hit in google... FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 19:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Delete - Gribanov seems to be a common spelling, but no evidence for this man, so looks like hoax information. Note there is one more hit for both names, for a teenager named Chris Gribben sometimes referred to by nickname Gribbenov, may be some sense of humor involved. Blockinblox - talk 19:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

And looking on the talk page reveals it was created by an IP who is normally much more blatant in their vandalism. I can't believe I actually cleaned it up according to the history when I was going through uncategorized articles! Blockinblox - talk 19:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, look at the history for Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. ~~User:Keitei seems to have something to do with this.~~ Never mind, he just rephrased the sentence in good faith by replacing a pronoun. But the very first incarnation also connects to Chris Gribben, and is pure pseudohistory, so our leg has clearly been pulled. Blockinblox - talk 19:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zigzagoon

In my opinion, simple.wikipedia isn't at the level of detail that is required for articles on individual species of Pokemon. Comments? PTO 04:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. 493 species of Pokemon, gotta catch them all, but certainly do not have to make an article on each one. That being the case though, I don't believe it to be a point of Simple not being at the level of detail for this to be the case. Simple's pokemon section not being of level? certainly. But not simple as a whole. IF someone were to be motivated in that area and create a 10-15K pokemon article, then went on with a full creature list article and finally moved on to various individual creature articles, I would not see it as an issue as long as the articles done at least had enough info for say 500 byte each. If that is the area they want to edit, so be it as long as the quality and quantity is there. But a 1 line statement about an obscure species? certainly not notable enough at this point. Much of the rest of the pokemon species in their category are over the 500byte limit and actually have some semblance of information in them that could be the foundation for a pokemon walled garden, but this article is just not up there. -- Creol(talk) 06:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete cos only core articles are allowd. Previous unsigned comment was added by 166.121.37.10 01:11, February 15, 2007

Delete, per core article guideline.-- Tdxi a n g 09:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Redirect to Pokémon.--TBCΦtalk? 22:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment, by the way, should other pages in Category:Pokémon be nominated for deletion as well?--TBCΦtalk? 22:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment If there is something resembling an article, like Bulbasaur, there is no reason to delete it. Brock and Aerodactyl might be candidates for a merge, but even there I don't think it is necessary to delete the content, just to move it. See my vote below. --Rimshot 12:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge the non-articles into a characters section of Pokémon. Keep articles that are long enough, put links to them on the Pokémon page. At some point there might come someone who wants to make a complete list of Pokémon characters. Until that day, I don't think there is a need for a separate article for the character listing. --Rimshot 12:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Redirect to Pokémon. poké-cruft.--Werdan7^{T @} 23:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. When this wikipedia grows, then we can consider articles on pokemon. Not yet though. I would say that the only individual pokemon needed is Pikachu. Bulbasaur is alright though, and it's fine to keep that. Zigzagoon is an obscure pokemon, and should be created when simple english wikipedia seriously grows. Cream147 10:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted -- Creol(talk) 01:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

[edit] Handwavium

Pointless but has content. Belongs more on Uncyclopedia JameiLei 11:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. -- Creol(talk) 10:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Transwiki to wiktionary after simplification and cleanup. This actually a legitimate topic.--Werdan7^{T @} 22:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete If I am to believe the en.wikipedia definition of handwavium (here and here), the article describes situations where handwavium could possibly be found, without actually saying what handwavium is. Also, to name Mohammed or Prime Minster John Howards' hair as example of handwavium is either offensive or funny, but not encyclopedic. Write a wiktionary definition if you will, but not based on this article. --Rimshot 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

- Done., deleted.-- Tdxi a n g 09:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Dimakis

Vanity page. Page was previously quick deleted as vandalism/not notable (by me) but has been remade and as such is no longer QD candidate but requires RfD now to delete it. No google hits at all for the complete title of the page. -- Creol(talk) 10:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable nonsense (the surgeon refused to operate, on the grounds that the cat was his daughters pet, etc.). Wodup 10:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong Delete Utter nonsense. --Rimshot 11:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, per nom.--Werdan7^{T @} 21:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete It's complete nonsense. Even though it can't be quick deleted, it should be deleted as quickly as possible :-) Tygartl1 19:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Done., deleted.-- Tdxi a n g 09:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edwardo menendez

EnWP has various Menendez, amongst others (redlinked) Ed, as a Software developer. Spanish wikipedia has nothing interesting. Google finds a doctor of Anthropology, of the University of Buenos Aires. It is well possible that this is a hoax. --Eptalon 21:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete, unless it can be sourced. --Eptalon 21:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete -- Creol(talk) 22:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. unverifiable.--Werdan7^{T @} 23:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, as per nomination. --Rimshot 17 February 2007

- Done., deleted.-- Tdxi a n g 09:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King of Germany

I moved King of Germany to König von Deutschland. The latter is the title of a German song, the first its literal translation. I don't think anyone would search for "King of Germany" to find the song. Therefore, King of Germany is not needed anymore Rimshot 13:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep. Leave as a redirect. I don't see how this is misleading..--Werdan7^{T @} 22:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, add a dab link from König von Deutschland to Kaiser.--Werdan7^{T @} 01:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. I also repaired the for template. --Rimshot 09:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Redirect to Kaiser. When I think of "King of Germany", I immediately think of the the Kaiser of Germany. If I were someone who didn't know English well or didn't know history well, I might search for information about the King of Germany actually looking for Kaiser. I believe that a redirect to Kaiser would be appropriate or perhaps a disambiguous page. Browne34 14:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

- Done., deleted.-- Tdxi a n g 09:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rayjee

Looks like a vanity page, therefore I think we should delelte it. -- Eptalon 10:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete, as per above --Eptalon 10:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, vanity page. Also, the text is from here: gaiaonline.com, I'm not sure about the copyright status, but looks like copyvio to me. --Rimshot 12:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, as above. Ksbrown^talk 10:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
delete --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, vanity page and possible copyvio.--TBCΦtalk? 22:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete QD-A4 nn person.--Werdan7^{T @} 23:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, as Copyright problems JameiLei 11:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete as vanity page, questionable on copyvio as it is apparently a copy of the editors own self description of their character on that site and as such seems to be more a case of OR 0R (Vanity OR..) than copyvio.-- Creol(talk) 10:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Result: Deleted PTO 00:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Center for Advanced Techologies

This page has stood there as a straight copy of the intro paragraphs from en.wikipedia for two months now. No progress has been made on making this a simple wikipedia page. Rimshot 18:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTABILITY - Google search for Centre for Advanced Technologies has no hits relevant to the article's context; article. The education notability is further questioned by the fact that the subject is in a Secondary school, rather than a University which further questions the integrity and notability of the CfAT. Finally, the article's deletion can be justified by WP:BASE - if the article does turn out to be worth a space on our servers, it can be added when we have all of our primary articles up to standard.

Anthonycfc (talk • connect) 19:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep I'm incline to vote keep because of the ramblings about 'primary articles, blah blah'. This kind of talk just scares people away from SE Wikipedia because they feel their article is unwanted. Xania 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete I have nominated the article, and now that some more days have gone by I still think it should be deleted. Someone copied it here in the hopes that someone else would do the hard work of simplifying it. That hasn't happened, and now I think it is time for the article to go. On the topic of notability: the subject matter of the article does not seem notable enough to make up for its shortcomings. --Rimshot 12:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. nn school.--Werdan7^{T @} 23:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted -- Creol(talk) 23:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kikyo, Kagome, Naraku, and other InuYasha characters

My thoughts on InuYasha character pages: There have been a number of pages on InuYasha characters added to SE lately. I would like to suggest that a single page be created called List of InuYasha characters and that the following pages be deleted and the information on them be moved to the new "List" page: Kikyo, Kagome, Naraku, Onigumo, Midoriko, Sango, Miroku, Kirara, and Shippo. I would also suggest that the information on Shikon no Tama be merged into the main InuYasha article. It seems unnecessary to have pages on each of the characters. English Wikipedia has a page for each individual character, but Simple English Wikipedia is not another English Wikipedia and I think that a list page would allow us to have the information while not dedicating too much time and energy to a topic that is not among the most important for a developing encyclopedia to have. Tygartl1 17:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no overview of the current situation; at the least a common category looks appropriate (if it is not already there). The merging of smaller articles into bigger ones also seems logical; since I do not know how simple (or complex) inuYasha is, I cannot judge what to merge where. -- Eptalon 22:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Half of the articles linked above are already longer than the average simple wikipedia article. They are written in rather simple English, even if it is not perfect. Also, they are already categorized under Category:InuYasha. A combined article, I think, might become too long. As it stands now, I vote to keep the articles, because deleting or merging them would not benefit simple.wikipedia. Rimshot 19:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep Large articles. What's the problem? Xania 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. Kept.-- Tdxi a n g 02:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nasal hair

Direct copy from en.wikipedia Rimshot 20:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete because it is a copy from en.wikipedia. Unless someone wants to rewrite of course, but I don't think we want to encourage the copying of complete articles from en.wikipedia.Rimshot 20:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Rewrite or delete. It seems notable enough to keep but if it's not simplified it should go. Tygartl1 17:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep + Simplify: keep - the article does seem valid to be included in an online encyclopedia, and therefore passes the basic principle of WP:NOTABILITY; however, I also suggest simplify - the article is clearly copied and pasted, word-for-word, direct from w:en:Nasal hair, and therefore does not conform to simple english.
Anthonycfc (talk • connect) 20:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep + Simplify - as per above arguements. Xania 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Result:Kept--Eptalon 01:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Acker

The article states that Acker is a tennis term named after Ian Acker. There is no tennis player Ian Acker. There is no such term. Rimshot 14:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment Amazingly, the article survived for half a year. ackered tennis gives only one useful google result, namely a blog. Rimshot 14:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable. Tygartl1 17:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - WP:NOTABILITY: Google search for Acker move returns no results related to tennis; Google search for Acker, Tennis returns a blog result, per comment above. Therefore, the article clearly fails notability and does not constitute an article on simple or any wikipedia.
Anthonycfc (talk • connect) 20:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. --Eptalon 09:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete as nonsense. "Acker" is Somerset dialect for "friend" or "mate", as in Acker Bilk.[1] Even if corrected, it wouldn't be notable. Totnesmartin 18:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Ksbrown^talk 17:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete, non-notable neologism.--TBCΦtalk? 07:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Amusing but time for it to go. Xania 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC

Result: Deleted --Eptalon 01:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] General semantics

General semantics is not the same as semantics. This article describes semantics, even though it shouldn't Rimshot 14:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment en:General semantics is an educational discipline that deals with semantics but is distinct from it. Rimshot 14:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Rewrite - actually I already rewrote it based on the en:wiki article since the article in question was effectively moved to the correct page already. Still tagged as RfD though just in case. -- Creol(talk) 15:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep the rewrite. I will remove the RfD Friday evening, if there are no more votes. Rimshot 19:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - enough Google hits to demonstrate notability; article is clearly high enough quality to deserve a place on our encylopedia. The fact that the article is benefiting, and is a pride of, the encyclopedia (in that it is not a stub) is enough for us to keep the article.
Anthonycfc (talk • connect) 20:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Kept - Re-written -- Creol(talk) 16:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ness' Dad (EarthBound)

Minor character in a video game that's no longer sold. Archer7 - talk 09:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Merge to main article -- Creol(talk) 09:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge --Eptalon 13:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge - Tygartl1 14:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 15:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Merged -- Creol(talk) 16:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Captain Strong (EarthBound)

Minor character in a video game that's no longer sold. Archer7 - talk 09:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Merge to main article -- Creol(talk) 09:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge --Eptalon 13:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge - Tygartl1 14:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Merged -- Creol(talk) 16:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Memorial diamonds

Looks like an advertisement. What is needed is an article on cremation not an article on one particular way of processing the remains. Also, precisely the same text can be found on en.wikipedia. Rimshot 12:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Create cremation, rewrite memorial diamonds and merge into cremation article. Tygartl1 15:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Update: I have created a page for cremation and included info about what to do with the remains, including turning them into diamonds. It's just a stub for now, since I didn't include any of the religious reasons and rules about cremation but it's a start. Tygartl1 16:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete since the info is now available elsewhere. Tygartl1 14:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete this one. Come up with something about cremation if it is more than a dicdef. --Eptalon 16:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 15:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete - the article is clearly an advertisement:

"...having a hue does nothing to restrict the brilliant fire flashes and sparkle associated with diamonds..."

--paragraph II

This is a clear attempt to brush aside the negative issues assosiated with the process, therefore qualifying as a WP:NPOV-violating advertisement. Ergo, I vote delete this article.

Anthonycfc (talk • connect) 00:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete Badly written (for a simple english encyclopedia) advert. Ksbrown^talk 18:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted -- Creol(talk) 16:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://simple.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_deletion_Log_4_81b7.html"

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Log 4

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] March 2007

[edit] Serkan sarioglan

[edit] March 2004

[edit] Kanbearer

[edit] Lang-a-bang

[edit] Template:Prettytable

[edit] Template:DuckTales, Template:Disney direct-to-video animated features, Template:Darkwing Duck

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject

[edit] List of municipalities of Switzerland

[edit] Template:Blocked

[edit] Christopher Gribbenov

[edit] Zigzagoon

[edit] February 2007

[edit] Handwavium

[edit] Andrew Dimakis

[edit] Edwardo menendez

[edit] King of Germany

[edit] Rayjee

[edit] Center for Advanced Techologies

[edit] Kikyo, Kagome, Naraku, and other InuYasha characters

[edit] Nasal hair

[edit] Acker

[edit] General semantics

[edit] Ness' Dad (EarthBound)

[edit] Captain Strong (EarthBound)

[edit] Memorial diamonds

Views

Getting around

Search