User talk:3bulletproof16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] WrestleMania 22
The only reason I would consider putting it in is because a similar mention is made at the WrestleMania VI page (about DDP being the driver of Honky Tonk Man and Greg Valentine's car). Maybe if it was sourced? I think I could find a source for it if that matters. TJ Spyke 23:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the only reason why I found the WMVI/X8 thing notable was because coincidentally Edge and DDP both returned to compete at a WrestleMania after making an appearance at one before. Not only that but I find it even more interesting that they would return to a WrestleMania in the same stadium they appeared in before. I think it should be added if CM Punk goes on to compete at 23. However, I’m not too sure if he actually was one of the gangsters that appeared at 22 so a source would be need. I'll look for one. -- bulletproof 3:16 23:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Son Gohan
Sorry I haven't presented an official source yet. I'm in the process of finding recorded proof, but I saw Dragonball Z episode 150 very recently. There was a scene inside the Room of Spirit and Time where Goku asks Gohan to show his power. Gohan transforms into a Super Saiyan, then after a few words he powers up further and his hair stands further on end and his muscle-span increases. It seemed to be the same form that Vegeta was in when he fought Cell in his second stage. I could be wrong, but Gohan seemed to be a bit above a normal Super Saiyan, and Goku seemed to realized the weakenesses of the Ultra Super Saiyan form after watching Gohan. Do you have any idea where I could find official records or pictures to show his transformation? Full Shunyata 09:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] McMahon vs. Trump
Do you really think we should leave this match announcement on Vince's page? Aren't we not supposed to add matches that have been announced and not taken place? Bmg916 Speak to Me 03:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- I know it's not speculative information, but the warnings still say not to add matches that have been announced but not taken place, isn't that what this is? Bmg916 Speak to Me 03:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- (DO NOT ADD WEEK BY WEEK EVENTS, RUMORS OR SPECULATION. THIS INCLUDES ANNOUNCED MATCHES THAT HAVE NOT YET OCCURRED. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A NEWS SITE BUT AN ONLINE ENCYCLOPAEDIA. Please see the articles "Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not" and "Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles" for more information.) If that's the case, then the part I bolded should seriously be re-worded, because it's easily misinterpreted. I have seen several cases where matches announced either on television or WWE.com are constantly removed from pages because of that sentence. Bmg916 Speak to Me 03:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Affiliates
I have checked WWE's affiliates website, and can't find any mention of the 2008 PPV schedule. Can you tell me where on their site it is? Lrrr IV 07:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Do you have MSN? I need to talk to you but you don't have e-mail enabled. Lrrr IV 11:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC) I explained it in the edit summerary, but I reverted the edit. Sites like Rajah and PWInsider often post rumors and act like they are real. None of the official sites (WWE's main site, the WWE Corporae website, or the WWE Affiliate website) make any mention of the 2008 PPV dates. Taking a look at your edit history, you seem to only add in things after WWE makes them official, so I don't know why you added in these unofficial dates. Lrrr IV 04:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- I actually did find the dates posted on WWE Affiliates site around the same time the article was released by PWInsider. I usually do not accept any sort of information that has not been released by WWE officialy, however, in this case I actually did find the dates posted on the site. I don't know why they were taken down from the WWE Affiliates page though. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe WWE decided to change them. If you remember, they also briefly had Armageddon in early November. I would treat those previous dates as unofficial now. Lrrr IV 04:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. WWE probably took them down after mistakenly releasing the dates.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you still log onto the page? I just tried (with the princeofspace account) and it now says the e-mail is not registered. Lrrr IV 06:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. WWE probably took them down after mistakenly releasing the dates.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe WWE decided to change them. If you remember, they also briefly had Armageddon in early November. I would treat those previous dates as unofficial now. Lrrr IV 04:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nemu continues to redirect pages without consensus
Hey there, its Power level. Look, I know you don't like me and think I'm an idiot but I should let you know this: Nemu redirected Bojack, Janemba and Tullece to their appropiate character's lists without discussing about it on the respective talk pages. I reverted his edits once and gave a good reason why they deserved their own page. He reverted me nonchalantly. He says he'll stop reverting me/redirecting them if you talk him out of it. Can ya do it? Their main articles are fine and I see no reason why they should be redirected. Please say something to him or revert the pages back yourself with a decent reason in your edit summary. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 22:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Bleach
Konban-wa, Bulletproof-san! I recently proposed a Bleach WikiProject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals and thought that, although you're more of a Dragon Ball kind of guy than you are a Bleach kind of guy when it comes to articles on Wikipedia, you might be interested in voicing your opinions. A couple of the project's goals are listed on the proposal page and if the project passes the proposal, I will get started on an official to-do list. I'm willing to hear any and all criticism, comments, and ideas to help improve the project. Thank you for your time! // PoeticDecay 23:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dragonball Wiki
- Hi there. I noticed you're a member of Wikiproject Dragonball, and I'm trying to recruit some people from that to contribute to the Dragon Ball Wiki. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get Angela and Sannse to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed Manual of Style going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible/consistent. If you're interested, please hop on over or talk to me. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not. Wildyoda 02:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Report
Yet again, user Wrestlinglover420 has vandalised the Ultimate Spider-Man (story arcs) page, and seems unable to learn from mistakes; he's done the very thing that got him banned from editing that page in the first place, adding information about a forthcoming Storyline that has no verifcation or source. In previous times, he has vandalised my own page with abuse; he has a frequent history of doing so. I would suggest banning him from editing Wikipedia at all, as he seems unable to learn from mistakes. SaliereTheFish 11:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WPPW
I see nothing in WP:PW that covers my edits to ONS. Quote it please. BuyAMountain 01:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Your last edit to ECW One Night Stand was an acceptable compromise. I withdraw my complaint.BuyAMountain 02:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Redirects
I'm not sure that I would ask somebody to fix double redirects when he has wasted his time fixing them, as clearly indicated by his contribution history. Because we all know that a user would type in Tatta Hitori no Saishû Kessen ~Furîza ni Idonda Z Senshi Kakarotto no Chichi, right? ' 02:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- "Bad links disrupt Wikipedia"? The worst that occurs is a small note below the title. Redirects aren't terrible, horrid beasts to avoid at all costs. Fix them when you come across them. Setting aside time to fix 100+ perfectly working redirects is only a waste of time. ' 04:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] unneeded revert
hey, why did you revert my addition to The Dragonball Z page? All I did was add dragonballs and list of Dragonball special abilities. Fusion didn't need to be there it only appears in two volumes. DBZROCKS 13:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dragon Ball Z is the baby????? of the second portion of the immensely popular Dragon Ball manga baby???? Thats why-- bulletproof 3:16 02:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup on List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball
Since you requested the cleanup, I'm informing you I went ahead and did some major (really MAJOR) reworking of the list. I get the feeling it'll be reverted, but nonetheless went ahead with it. This wasn't on a whim, I actually thought it over on how to better the list. Just letting you know.--Nohansen 05:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Super Saiyan
A user continues adding Super Saiyan 5 to the list. Apparantly I've reverted three times already and I was wondering if you could help. Thanks--양복42 23:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fixed your problem
Fixed it. See User talk:Deskana#WP:DBZ_page_moves. :-) --Deskana (Alright, on your feet soldier!) 01:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Deskana!-- bulletproof 3:16 01:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:WM22logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WM22logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. «»bd(talk stalk) 22:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WM X-Seven
This user upload a pic over yours that IMO looks worse. Do you still have the old pic saved on your computer? TJ Spyke 23:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Took care of it. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WCW World Title
WWE may call it the WCW Title in their results now, but they did start calling the WCW Title just "World Championship" after Survivor Series 2001. I can provide results that were written at the time to support it if you would like proof. TJ Spyke 02:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Smackdown! vs. RAW 2008
Regarding this tagging, I can't find any evidence of a previous AfD discussion, and there is no previous deletion in the logs. Could you elaborate? Thanks. Rockpocket 08:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Here you are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WWE_SmackDown_vs._Raw_2008 -- bulletproof 3:16 19:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- No, thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] WWE Backlash
The poster seems legit, as it's on the In-Demand website (whether it's the final poster WWE will use or not is unknown): http://www.indemand.com/viewProduct.jsp?prodId=61754 TJ Spyke 23:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WCW World Title
There are so many things wrong with leaving the section as is. 1. Vince McMahon officially changed the name of the title the night after the Survivor Series. http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/results/raw/011119.html. I didn't include it as a source because, quite frankly, why source the results to a television program that aired on TV? 2. It should be mentioned that Jericho is the final champion. 3. The title was NEVER called the WCW World Championship in the WWF in 2001. NEVER. It's just the way they name their titles. And yes, video boxarts DO count as support.
Hopefully when you realize this, you'll stop with the unnecessary reverts. Thank you. Mshake3 02:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- So then, what is your source on the title being called the WCW World Championship while in the WWF? Mshake3 02:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- "First, Y2J defeated The Rock to win the WCW Championship". Most of the articles during 2001 with the title defended in the WWF say "WCW Championship". And while the page graphic refers to the championship, it doesn't exactly answer what the WWF called it on television in 2001. This is what it comes down to, how it was presented on television when it originally aired.Mshake3 02:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Multi-brand PPV's
It looks like all WWE PPV's will now feature all 3 brands (as announced on WWE's corporate website): [3]. TJ Spyke 23:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Olympics WikiProject membership update
The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.
Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}
, in order to renew or cancel your membership.
[edit] List of WWE Champions
I could go either way with pics being in it. However, most of those are fair use and having that many fair use pictures is not allowed. I would say just remove them. If somebody is really interested in seeing what they look like, they can click on the wrestlers name. TJ Spyke 02:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Obsessed with Wrestling
Until I can get it removed from the spam list, the only way to remove vandalism on pages that link to OWW is to edit the individual sections (so if the vandalism is in the results section, just edit the results section). If you try to edit the entire page, you have to remove the link (or at least remove the www. part). TJ Spyke 23:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- This is annoying, I have had to put the link back in on several PPV articles. Do not revert entire pages. Go back to the last unvandalized verson of the page, copy the correct section and then paste it in the current article. This way you revert the vandalism without removing the OWW link. TJ Spyke 23:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Safeco Field edit
360 Architecture’s role on Safeco Field as Design Consultant to the Seattle Mariners began with establishing, along with the Mariners, the ballpark program document and assisting in evaluation of three potential sites.
In addition, 360 Architecture was responsible for the design of the majority of the ballpark’s interior spaces, including the private suites and concourses, team store, hall of fame, administrative offices, clubs, restaurants and lounges.
Sdkucera 14:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] L.A. Coliseum and Sports Arena
First one user (redlink) and then another (IP address) have tried to revert your changes. I'm going on the assumption that the "downtown" reference is correct, but I wonder what the deal is on these arenas and why the hair-splitting between "downtown" and "south central". Since I don't know L.A. that well, perhaps you could clue in this midwesterner. :) Wahkeenah 23:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- 10-4. Hey, I like your mating flies. With baseball season approaching, there will be plenty of flies. I'm reminded of a nature film I once saw which had a clip of a veritable orgy of mating sea slugs. I reckon they look beautiful to each other, anyway. That would be an interesting pic to post. It would be a true "slugfest". :) Wahkeenah 00:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Recent edits to Hulk Hogan
It is getting tedious, isn't it! Gretnagod 23:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another sock
You said: "Since I've noticed that you have been involved with socks on WP:PW, I just wanted to bring another sockpuppet user to your attention. User:Zenon2007 and User:Jet2006 have been editing Wrestlemania 25. It is suppose to be a redirect page mainly because nothing on the subject has been verified or even acknowledged anywhere and the only thing these socks have been adding is rumors and speculation such as..."It has also been rumored to be in Boston, Massachusetts." They have also been adding the page to 2009. The reason I believe they are both socks is because of the similarities in their user names and edits. Both have edited the same articles such as those that are soccer related and have reverted the redirect on Wrestlemania 25 to the same version as the other. It would really appreciated if you could protect the page and leave it as a redirect."
- Done, protected the redirect for one month. You are right, likely sockpuppet and crystal-balling. --Yamla 21:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WM 23
Help me here, I'm kinda frustrated with this dude that keeps adding the note on the page. Should i warn him? Killswitch Engage 17:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- If he persists then yeah do warn him. It seems he’s cooled down a bit though. I'll look into it. -- bulletproof 3:16 17:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you for helping deal with that user who seems to have a vendetta against me. TJ Spyke 20:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- No prob man. Glad to help. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I filed a sockpuppet report, if you think he has any other sockpuppets (or think you know who the true sockpuppet mast is), the report is here: Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/TJ_Spike. TJ Spyke 23:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, I'll see what I can do. I can get in touch with Yamla and Chris Kreider if need be. I just got back from dinner so I should be able to keep an eye out. What are the names of the socks so far? I can go through the logs and see if they created any sleeper accounts through those socks. Bmg916Speak to Me 23:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- They've not. Unforunately for us they're smarter than that. They're all blocked now anyway. --Deskana (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The damn socks wont stop! User:Rightman2's contribs -- bulletproof 3:16 10:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it's a distinct possibility. We'd have to run another check user though. Bmg916Speak to MeLeave Your Mark 12:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I think he should be blocked indefinitely for violations of WP:CIVIL and WP:SOCK, not to mention that video he keeps trying to add deliberately places Wikipedia in legal jeopardy because it's definitely a copyright violation as pertains to linking to copyrighted works (because the video is on a third party site) not to mention a violation of WP:EL. If a check user comes through that he's using socks for ban evasion, then he should be blocked indefinitely, period. Bmg916Speak to MeLeave Your Mark 12:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- This vandal won't stop: User:SUCKDXIT. TJ Spyke 22:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know I just reported him. Damn socks!!! -- bulletproof 3:16 22:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it's a distinct possibility. We'd have to run another check user though. Bmg916Speak to MeLeave Your Mark 12:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The damn socks wont stop! User:Rightman2's contribs -- bulletproof 3:16 10:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Nope: User:Debris420. TJ Spyke 21:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- They've not. Unforunately for us they're smarter than that. They're all blocked now anyway. --Deskana (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] World Intellectual Property Organization
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on World Intellectual Property Organization. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. --Edcolins 20:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, sorry about the message above then... Cheers. --Edcolins 20:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your tireless effort to help deal with those sockpuppets who have something against me. You will be an admin for sure someday TJ Spyke 22:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] World Intellectual Property Organization (cont'd)
There is some concern there regarding the lack of clear edit summary in your last to edit to World Intellectual Property Organization (apart from "rvv"). It would be nice to address this concern, by explaining to Tim B why you reverted his edit as vandalism! Thanks for your cooperation. --Edcolins 20:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- What about this edit then here, after the sockpuppet disruption, and before your last edit? --Edcolins 21:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- You shouldn't have reverted it to the last version by TJ Spyke, since Tim B had already considered the issue and made an edit afterwards (after the socketpuppetting edit war), to endorse the proposed change as duly explained in the talk page [4]. Anyway, I suggest now reverting to Tim B version. I concur with his analysis. --Edcolins 22:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Alright, thanks. I have reverted your last rvv to the last version by Tim, who had already considered the issue indeed, even if you had not seen it. --Edcolins 22:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for signing my autograph book! Bmg916SpeakSign 00:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)