User talk:Alison/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents 1 Blarney 2 Gerry Adams 3 unclear edit 4 WikiLove 5 INS 6 Protecting Greystones 7 Ante Pavelic 8 Nastassja Kinski 9 NPOV tag at Andre article 10 Greystones 11 You-know-who 12 Huw Garmon 13 Meaningless tag 14 Did you read it 15 John de Courcy Ireland

Blarney

hi ali-oops,

thank you for your reversion of my revision in the blarney entry of your encyclopedia. im sorry to have messed it up on you. i didnt realise you owned the entry.

regards, the blarney guy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.134.255.151 (talk • contribs).

• I don't, but calling Cork people "knackers" with "monkey like arms" is just a weency bit POV, no? [1] - Ali-oops^✍ 19:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

hi ali-oops,

myself and my buddy here reckon you need to lighten up a small bit. cork people all over the world are famous for taking the piss out of themselves. i take it you arent from cork so?

all the best, the blarney guy from Cork. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.134.255.151 (talk • contribs).

• I'm a Jackeen, though I've been here in Cork for over a decade. Does it show? - Ali-oops^✍ 20:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

thats an easy one:

Leinster or Munster? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.134.255.156 (talk • contribs).

• Munster - duh! (and I saw your edits to Leinster Rugby - very funny, boys!) - Ali-oops^✍ 22:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Gerry Adams

Hi Ali, you recently reverted 65.88.88.200 (talk • contribs) at Gerry Adams, calling him Robert. Could you let me know which user this is, please? Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 06:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, now I see you left it on my talk page: Robert Sieger. I accidentally deleted your comment without even seeing it when I deleted his. I take it this is rms@hotmail.com. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 06:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, this is Robert Sieger. He was banned last month for his behaviour but continues to attempt to evade the block - Ali-oops^✍ 07:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

unclear edit

Hi. In [2] you mentioned "image is appropriate". WHAT IMAGE? --Procrastinating@^talk2me 20:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• You're looking at a diff across a number of edits. There are two others in between yours and mine. Check the edit history here and the delta between my edit and the previous one here - Ali-oops^✍ 22:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiLove

INS

It was the beginning of my downfall. Can you review my edits and make a note in the edit summaries so they are not all automatically deleted by your countrymen?? You don't have anything better to do, do you?? I've been good and avoided the controversial pages, as you have undoubtedly noticed.

Thanks, luv —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.4.43 (talk • contribs).

I'll leave this comment on the main page, Robert. Firstly;

• Quit calling me 'luv' - it's patronising and demeaning. Use my username or first name if you must.

• You are using IP addresses to evade the ban imposed upon you. You've been doing this for weeks.

• I review every single one of your edits. If there is POV/vandalism/etc, I'll either revert it or fix it. If it looks okay, I'll generally leave it. Same as I'd do with any other edits, really. I've no interest in 'censoring' anyone so don't go there.

• Yes, I noticed you've left certain articles alone. Very good. However, the problem isn't necessarily the content but your approach. I don't think you realise that yet.

• There are probably about 15 editors and maybe 3 admins watching your every move right now. You earned every one of them. I've no control over these people.

• Demiurge may revert every one of your edits if Demiurge sees fit. You've been banned, after all.

• I've plenty of better things to be doing, but I'll see what I can do. It sounds like you're trying to compromise/co-operate and that's a welcome departure.

- Ali-oops^✍ 10:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Protecting Greystones

Hi Ali-oops, Do you know how to go about getting Greystones protected? - The vandals won't leave it alone. Jhonan ^talk 16:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Answered on your talk page - Ali-oops^✍ 18:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks v. much! Jhonan ^talk 18:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Ante Pavelic

Please, elaborate where do you see the disputes related to this article. Who disputed it and how?

Best regards,

--Purger 01:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Nastassja Kinski

Hi Ali-oops, I saw that there took place a little editwar between Demiurg and an anonymous pighead (who stated to be a former INS employee) about the date of birth of the German actress. I live in Germany and I adressed myself to the Berlin authorities (see). 1961 is definiteley correct. If the anonymous guy did edit the IMDb date - as he writes - he damaged this database, which is really a shame. Greetings to the beautiful Ireland --Bogart99 15:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

NPOV tag at Andre article

Since you placed the NPOV tag back in the article, can you please come to the article's talk page to dsicuss why it's needed? NPOV tags must be accompanied by information that justifies why you think the NPOV tag is needed, or the tag should be removed. NPOV tags should be accompanied by criticism that's fixable; if nothing is ever articulated as to what needs fixing, the tag has to come off. · Katefan0 ^(scribble) 03:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Greystones

I see that you too have reverted this page. Can we get protected it from editing by anon users? I think that might keep some of the vandalism from happening as most of it has been from anon users, not registered users, though not often several times in 24 hours. I don't know how to get that done. Cheers ww2censor 17:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

You-know-who

Thanks for the info re you-know-who's latest rant. However, I won't be replying, as it only encourages him. I don't know what he expects to gain from it, as it will only serve to advertise what a bigot he is...sad. Camillus (talk) 14:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Huw Garmon

Hi. The Church of Christ historian is not the same as Richard Cyril Hughes, who is a Welsh historian. They don't even have the same initials. Please revert your changes. Deb 17:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Sorry - my mistake. Reverted - Ali-oops^✍ 18:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Meaningless tag

{{sockpuppet|Purger|evidence=[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Purger]]}}

Note: The tag above is meaningless. This IP address (64.18.16.251) is not a single user address - rather a proxy server IP address used by many people - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.18.16.251 (talk • contribs).

• It doesn't matter whether it's a proxy server addy or not. It marks the address as being a potential route for sockpuppetry/abuse and that's enough - Ali-oops^✍ 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

You aren't too bright, are you? All I am trying to tell you - just discriminate between plural and singular i.e beween a proxy server (=many users) and a single user - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.18.16.251 (talk • contribs).

• There's no need to be rude. Like I said, it doesn't matter whether its a proxy gateway or not (and yes, I did rDNS). It's obvious, even from this comment, that the address is *used* by a sockpuppet. Other editors may judge accordingly - Alison^✍ 06:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Did you read it

My position statement. Did you read it?

Do you see where I am comming from on this. We have to realize that both I and Bailey livein the same place. Chicago,IL USA. I will give it to you that in the wider world there may be other groupings that are relevant but here In Chicago there are only two. It was also the same in LA. In fact when I live in LA briefely, a decade ago, I never saw anyone who could be called an autogynephille. They just ran in totally different circles.

I am speaking from my own observations not anyone's book on the existance of at least two (possiblly three) types. With the third effectively bisexual type being nearly indistinguisheable fromt the homosexual type (using baileys nomenclature). Only difference is some needed to try sex with a woman a couple of times to be sure they did not like it. They did not need to marry women happliy for 20 years and raise five kids to be sure. Among other non trivial differences.--Smartgirl62 14:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Anyway I am creating a post merger version of the articles on "Autogynephillia" and "Homosexual Transexuals". I have entitled it Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory, I feel such a title gives no priority to anyone who would be in either group. I will redirect Autogynephillia and homosexual transsexual links to this article once it is copleate. I invite you to help. Be it known I will not stand for this article becomeing mostly about gutogynephillia and the reactions of people effected by that label. --Smartgirl62 14:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Answered on your talk page - Alison^✍ 17:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Nice. I am no fan of BBL's theories either. Please realize same about most young, androphillic transsexuals. --Smartgirl62 00:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

No I think that's the perfect title for the article. It referes to who created the theory. Which is the scientific convention when the creator of the theory does not provide a name. I am going to execute the merger soon. I fugure we can work out whatever the problems are after that.--Smartgirl62 15:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• Just make sure you're not operating unilaterally and have a certain community support for the merger. Otherwise it may go wrong. Maybe start a vote? - Alison^✍ 15:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• • The merger and redirect seem to have come off without a hitch. As all concerned parties agree this decision seems it will stand. Please feel free to edit the living crap out of the new article if you feel the need. Peace.--Smartgirl62 20:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

John de Courcy Ireland

Regarding maritime articles, and the fact that he was from Munster ... would you be able to dig up anything on John de Courcy Ireland? User:ClemMcGann is right in that we don't have much to show for an island nation, but anything on the late John would be a good start. Cheers, Fergananim 20:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Yep - see what I can do. There's a stub article here - I'll see if I can flesh it out .... - Alison^✍ 20:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Vunderbar; not to put more work on ye, but if you ever find out what relation he was to John de Courcy and Baron Kingsale I'd be delighted to learn. Incidently I heard years ago that "Ireland" was added to their name back in the 17th and 18th century to distinuish the de Courcys in Ireland from those that emigrated over to France. Would love to learn more on the family as they and I share a common maternal ancestor. Long story! Fergananim 20:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Tall-ish order! Library job, methinks ... give me some time & I'll come up with something - Alison^✍ 20:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Check your email, permission granted for the pictures ClemMcGann 09:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)