User talk:Ancient Land of Bosoni
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] WWII
First of all, let's keep the personal attacks to a minimum, please. Also, the many different peoples that are included in the former USSR are almost universally Slavic, which IS an ethnic type. Perhaps you should do some more research before making any more broad assertions. Parsecboy 20:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you should read the first line in Slavic peoples. Also, I'm sure many more Chinese were butchered by the Japanese during the war. The "alleged killings"? Are you serious? Parsecboy 14:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your recent addition to World War Two. This is a general article providing a broad overview of the conflict. Specific details of specific atrocities or the effects of the war on specific ethnic groups are probably better addressed in more focussed articles. You've added this content and had it removed three or four times now. I respectfully suggest that, if you really want it in the article, you first discuss it on the talk page before adding it again. - Eron Talk 14:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you came to "nazi killing of slavs in china", but the Nazis did murder millions of Slavs in the USSR, and Japan (part of the Axis powers) killed millions of Chinese. Parsecboy 15:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
Thanx fromt that comment on my profile yep i would love for our land to unite but the west is not allowing it i guess they have a problem with a greater Albania or maby becuase we are magjority muslim or what ever but they specificaly said Kosovo is not to be united with any other country especialy ALBANIA. Gon4z
[edit] Personal attacks
Bosoni, you probably will not assume my good faith, but I have to warn you that edit summaries like this are unacceptable. I try to stay aside of ethnic feuds, but you're trying to turn it into a battleground. I don't want to template you or report to WP:AN/I, as you're long enough here.
Regarding your POV-pushing in World War II article, may I humbly suggest starting a Foča massacre 1942 article? There are plenty of sources (and it's even acknowledged in Serbian ones) [1][2]. Duja► 12:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you don't get me. I don't have any particular opinion about the content dispute you have with the anon; I was referring to the edit summary:
- Revert vandalistic, fascistic, nationalistic, radicalistic, amateuristic edits.
- WP:CIVIL is relevant for both talk pages and edit summaries. I don't think that calling another editor a "fascist" is appropriate under any circumstances. As far as I can tell, his removal of your text was justified as being a content fork from War in Bosnia and Herzegovina; I didn't even check if it's true. As for the article itself, I gave up closely watching it and similar crap.
- As for my IP, I'm 99.9999% of the time logged in when editing; it's this static one; only a few of those edits are mine, mostly when I had connection problems; others are from other University users. Duja► 13:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
OK. I tried to find some middle ground in Bosnian language as well. Duja► 14:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've been an admin since October 2006 or so. I succeeded at the first attempt, so you possibly have mistaken me for someone else (Pax/HRE?). Generally, I prefer to try settling matters by talking, and I'm especially reluctant to use the buttons against fellow Ex-Yu editors (except when they cross every line), partly because of perceived conflict of interest of mine. When I spotted your edit that triggered this exchange, I also mistook you for another editor; while I don't necessarily agree with your POVs, your good faith and capability for compromise are far above that. Regards, Duja► 14:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi from me, the anonymous
Good evening. I am the anonymous user who has been having a mini edit war with you the past few days (my IP is dynamic, so it changes each day). I see there are now some compromised versions of the text on those articles, and I am happy to accept them. P.S, sorry about the personal attacks in my edit summaries. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.186.184.160 (talk) 07:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Hi Bosoni
Hi brother. Things have stabilized with Srebrenica Massacre article. Let's hope they stay that way. I am proud of you for your valuable contribution to wikipedia. Thank you. Bosniak 22:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sarajevo Civil war
Hi Adrien. Thanks man, I saw that you try really hard on many articles to prevent serbs' and croats' nationalism and vandalism. You are much longer here than me and I am not very familiar with policy on english wikipedia (by the way, I am administrator on bosnian), so I am asking you to look Sarajevo Civil War and nominate it for deletion (of course if you agree with me). Best regards jarane :) --Kahriman 13:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ustašoidi u akciji
Želim te upozoriti, da korisnik Ivan Kricancic, pogledaj njegovu korisničku stranicu u svom suludom fanatizmu ide od slike do slike koja si tiče Bosne i predlaže je za brisanje. Često to radi nepotpisan: 58.165.115.192. Znam da je sa šupcima teško, ali degen je bolestan i pobrisao nam je na taj način sve skoro sve slike npr. u članku o genocidu u srebrenici, a sada stavlja šablone na slike koje si ti postavio, Markale. Emir Arven 08:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Retortion and Admonition of a Wholly Impertinent Comment
Alas, 'fellow editor', your rather impertinent and outwardly sardonic comment has seemingly failed to amuse me. I shall confess; the 'Sarajevo Civil War' was, indeed, a considerably inaccurate article, though, nonetheless, was my premiere article and is, therefore, relatively excusable insomuch as it was contrived solely as an autodidactic tutorial. I had no intention of offending any Balkans during the procreation of such an article and, as I shall earnestly confess, the content of the article had merely been gleaned from several online sources entitled, 'The Sarajevo Civil War'. In conclusion, I must request you confer your eloquent witticisms and stark indignation upon other individuals. -- Nalco 02:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:84 l-1-AdrienBosoni.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:84 l-1-AdrienBosoni.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi Friend
There is an arbitration for Osli73 case (he was disrupting Srebrenica Genocide article). I think you should vote "oppose" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Osli73 Thank you. Bosniak 02:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Thanks
Np. Could you cite the source in the article so that further confusion is evaded (if it is you who placed that info in the first place)? Thanks. --PaxEquilibrium 20:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
