User talk:Andypandy.UK/Archive 7

Contents 1 AWB - Ck lostsword 2 Hey 3 RfA Thanks 4 Signpost updated for September 18th. 5 NPP 6 Just a note 7 User:Andypandy.UK/Sand 8 September Esperanza Newsletter 9 My shiny medal 10 RfA thanks 11 Sock arson 12 The Halo's RfA 13 Re:Talk page spamming 14 Thanks Andy 15 WP:Web 16 Discussion regarding speedy... 17 Doctor Evil's RfA 18 userpage 19 Your recent edits 20 Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks 21 Signpost updated for September 25th. 22 RC Patrol or Wikistalking...? 23 Nishkid64's RfA thanks 24 Thanks 25 Spyware Link 26 Q7 answered. 27 CAT:CSD hint removal 28 On colors 29 Re: Thank you 30 Signpost updated for October 2nd. 31 Bot work 32 Wbm article 33 Userpage revert 34 Your edit to Frank gulo 35 Thank you 36 RfA thanks 37 SITCIOT 38 Signpost updated for October 9th. 39 RE: IP Block 40 TY for RV on my User page 41 Thank You! 42 AP.BOT 43 APBOT 44 AP.BOT 45 Userbox migration, thank you again 46 Userbox migration scope 47 Thanks for helping me bypass the userbox migration for my user page 48 Anti-vandalism 49 Userboxes 50 AP.BOT on Wikipedia:Deletion process

AWB - Ck lostsword

Hi Andy. This is only my second day on AWB, so thanks for looking out for me. If you noitce me doing anything else wrong, please drop me a line. Thanks very much again. Ck lostsword|^queta!|_Suggestions? 11:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Great - will do. :D Ck lostsword|^queta!|_Suggestions? 11:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for being newbish, but is it OK if I am just using it to correct spellings? And if not, what should I use AWB for? Ck lostsword|^queta!|_Suggestions? 11:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, Andeh, just wanted you to know that I've answered your question. Thanks, --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 16:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully today with a result of (50/3/0). If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free to write me. I hope I will live up to your trust. Michael 01:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.

Volume 2, Issue 38	18 September 2006	About the Signpost

"Citizendium" project aims to rival Wikipedia	Report from the Simple English Wikipedia
News and notes	In the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

NPP

Yeah. I try to do it every day. Honestly it's amazing to see all of the junk we get. I really wish more sysops would do NPP. Regards, alphaChimp^(talk) 16:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Just a note

Hi... Your archive 6 is mislabeled above. It currently reads -> 10 sep. It should read "- 17 sep". cheers! --Storkk 16:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope... found you (and the typo) through a conversation I was trying to follow that happened in between those dates. You were helping a third grader subst his user boxes or something. I found your CfD through that. Cheers! Storkk 12:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Andypandy.UK/Sand

Deleted as requested. (aeropagitica) 14:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

September Esperanza Newsletter

Program Feature: Barnstar Brigade Here in Wikipedia there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go unappreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go unnoticed. As Esperanzians we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. This is where the Barnstar Brigade comes in. The object of this program is to seek out the people which deserve a Barnstar, and help them feel appreciated. With your help, we can recognize more dedicated editors! What's New? September elections are upon us! Anyone wishing to be a part of the Advisory Council may list themselves as a candidate from 18 September until 24 September, with the voting taking place from 25 September to 30 September. Those who wish to help with the election staff should also list themselves! Appreciation Week, a program currently in development, now has its own subpage! Share your good ideas on how to make it awesome there! The Esperanza front page has been redesigned! Many thanks to all who worked hard on it. Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.

The last AC meeting (full log) The proposals page has been updated, with some proposals being archived. Since the program in development Appretiaion week is getting lots of good ideas, it now has its own subpage. The September 2006 Council elections will open for nominations on 18 September 2006. The voting will run from 25 September 2006 until 30 September 2006. If you wish to be a candidate or a member of the elections staff, please list yourself! The new Esperanza front page design has but put up - many thanks to all who worked on it! TangoTango has written a script for a bot that will list new members of Esperanza, which will help those who welcome new Esperanzains greatly! Signed... Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, Freakofnurture, and Titoxd 04:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

My shiny medal

Thanks very much... I'm not the greatest writer, but I like there are ways for me to contribute. I love the concept of Wikipedia, there just needs to be a watchful eye for crud; I will be that filter.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

That is quite some backlog... I wonder how many of those articles are really needed? I did not go into the list, just saw it went back to Jan/06.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

You think it would only take a month to tackle that backlog of articles? I guess it would depend on the amount of effort was put into it. As I said before, not a writter here.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 22:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hey Andy. Thank you so much for supporting my RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate you taking time to ask good questions and review my history before deciding whether to support. Cheers mate, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 21:28, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

LOL I know! It was terrible of me to go out before the RfA finished. :) Sarah Ewart (Talk) 22:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Sock arson

Just wanted to thank you for burning the sock !vote on my RfA. Now if only we could have a massive sock bonfire with Willy 'n friends. ;) --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 22:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Halo's RfA

Thanks for the kind words Andeh, I'm working hard at being a better editor right now, but maybe I'll try again in the future :) Thε Halo ^Θ 20:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I sure will, as well as maybe trying to get one or two things up to FA or GA (in fact, something I've worked hard on is up for GA now). So at least I'll be busy for the future ;) Thε Halo ^Θ 20:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:Talk page spamming

If Megalodon99 was breaking some Wikipedia rule that I don't know of, what was it? If not, why can't he ask people to join our wiki? No-one has voiced any objections to it, have they? Um, reply here please. Vimescarrot 15:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem about the talk page, i was still browsing Wikipedia. Ok, we'll leave off the advertising then. Sorry bout that. Vimescarrot 15:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Andy

Thanks, Andy, for that very fast user page vandalism reversion! Very much appreciated. :) Sarah Ewart (Talk) 15:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:Web

I cheat! I have a bookmark folder which links to all of the major policy pages such as WP:NOT, WP:WEB, WP:OWN, WP:EL and also guidelines such as "asking for sources". --Charlesknight 17:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

No SAH, I'm a Editor SAH! with the 1st light laptop Division. I work for a living ;) --Charlesknight 17:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Discussion regarding speedy...

Would like to discuss the speedy on Allen Crane. I believe that it meets 7 requirements for WP:Music notability. My full support explanation is listed on the talk page. I hope you will allow me to add additional relevant facts or make changes to further satisfy notability requirements. Any suggestions? --Kittyw 19:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Doctor Evil's RfA

Hi Andy. I think you're a great editor and I've often been impressed when I've seen your work here on Wikipedia. I was surprised however by this edit. I don't see how you could seriously describe this editor as an "awesome" candidate for adminship. Is there something else going on here that I can't see? All the best, Gwernol 23:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. Petros471 08:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Andy, thanks for the reply. While I certainly understand the "don't bite the newbies" argument, I think there may be dangers to your strategy. Describing an RfA candidate as "awesome" when they aren't is, in the end, dishonest. I don't think WP:BITE calls for us to lie to the user, just not be harsh to them. The danger is the candidate may end up thinking "I am a good RfA candidate: look Andy, who is a respected editor, thought I was awesome, those other opinions must be just wrong". If may mislead people into thinking they have a chance at annother RfA sooner than they realistically do. Worse it might give them the impression that they failed because the "cabal" was out to get them, rather than because they legitimately weren't ready. That path leads to a very disgruntled user.

So I'm not so much worried by the fact that you are supporting a failing candidate - I personally don't like "moral support" !votes, but I do understand the intention behind them. Its the fact that you are misleading the candidate about why you are supporting them that worries me.

Either way, I'll let the matter drop and wish you good luck. Best, Gwernol 11:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

userpage

restored. New Year's over. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. hehe hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 16:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Touchè hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 16:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks

Hi, Andy, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.

Volume 2, Issue 39	25 September 2006	About the Signpost

Erik Möller declared winner in Board of Trustees election	Wikimania 2007 to be held in Taipei
Arbitration clerk Tony Sidaway resigns	Report from the Dutch Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

RC Patrol or Wikistalking...?

[1] Eh? ;) Yanksox 21:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Heh heh. Ok, have fun. Yanksox 21:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Lol. I can take everything as fun, besides, I find it amusing. Yanksox 21:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. LittleOldMe 12:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Spyware Link

Andy,

I noticed you removed a link to my how to article (http://pcs.suite101.com/article.cfm/i_ve_got_spyware_) on removal of spyware. I guess my real question is why you removed mine but the 2 links right above mine you left intact.

In my article I have 2 in depth tutorials on how to use spybot S&D and ad-aware. Granted, they are links but they both give good information not covered in either of the other articles. I was just wondering if you could give me some insight as to why you removed them.

You can email me at spike_67@yahoo.com Khitan—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.194.145.20 (talk • contribs).

Q7 answered.

Also, when/if you vote, could you update the count? I don't feel I should do it myself. -- Merope ^Talk 17:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

CAT:CSD hint removal

I completly disagree with this statement. It is like saying that this is a job that the admins have to do. It is not. Having the admins do the patroling reduces the time that they have for other admin activities. Some editors are already complaining that the admins are not doing editing since they are only doing admin work. Having all editors do the screening takes a large amount of work away from the admins and allows them to spend more time on admin activities like doing deletes. Patroling takes more time then reviewing the nominations and deleting those that need deleting, or moving to prod or moving to AfD or cleaning up or just pulling the tag. Statements that make it sound like admins have to do this are not helpful in my opinion. We should be pushing to have users do as much as they can and that's doing the patroling. Vegaswikian 19:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

One other point that you may be missing. I do ocassionally patrol new pages. In almost every case, I do not do a delete but add a speedy tag since I believe that I should not make a decision on my own. Yes, there will always be a few cases where the decision is obvious. But I believe that having someone else confirm my opinion is the right way to go. Vegaswikian 19:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Yea, I could be more bold. I know that my deletes are not approved by everyone given the trashing of my user and discussion page, saved by the bots!. Maybe at some point I will be bolder. I also skip quite a few and have also been accused of being too quick to pull the trigger. I have come to the conclusion that there is no perfect balance. No matter what you do, you will piss off someone. In any case, I still try to do some editing. If I was scanning the new pages I would not have time to do much else. Part of the burnout problem is there is too much to do. I think that we could do more good on the new page patrol if we could get the users to post a warning to the editors page when they add the notice. Vegaswikian 19:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

On colors

What's up with this edit to Template:RuneScape? Does the game really seem more burnt sienna than periwinkle to you? To me, it's more of a powder blue or maybe something in the myrtle/fern green region. Cordially, Hyenaste ^(tell) 23:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC) =)

The only reason it was lavender was to match the portal keyhole and video game infobox. Seeing as the temp. is no longer near them, it could really be any color. It still seems a bit too ochre though; maybe knock some goldenrod out and get it to be more of a tan... Hyenaste ^(tell) 23:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:^Aftermath^. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ^Aftermath^ 23:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thank you

Andypandy.UK wrote:

Thank you for the quick user page revert. Keep up the good work.--Andeh 14:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the prompt reversion of my user page. Keep up the good work!--Andeh 23:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I only reverted it once... but I appreciate your decision to thank me twice – Gurch 11:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.

Volume 2, Issue 40	2 October 2006	About the Signpost

New speedy deletion criteria added	News and notes
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Bot work

Can we get the bot to do something about removing the templates from user pages of userboxes that were deleted? —Centrx→talk • 15:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I have been going through old deletedpages, and one way would be to put them in a category that the bot goes through and removes items whereever they are transcluded. —Centrx→talk • 15:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

User:DumbBOT/TimeSortedPD (there are also others at Wikipedia:Protected deleted pages). —Centrx→talk • 16:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

On my user page, the bot did not removed the closing tag of the deleted templated Josie dethiers 11:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Wbm article

The {{db-copyvio}} tag doesn't work in this case, since the website that it was copied from doesn't have a copyright notice on it. I didn't tag it as spam since I'm not sure I like that criterion, and consensus has not yet been reached regarding it. Still, the article is crap and I won't mind too much if an admin nukes it. -- Merope ^Talk 17:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Userpage revert

Thanks! The poster was a 14 year old who was upset that I userfied his article about himself. NawlinWiki 20:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Frank gulo

Your recent edit to Frank gulo (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 15:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Shhh you.--Andeh 15:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. Snoopydance 20:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 66/11/5. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but I hope you will let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- Merope Talk 13:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

SITCIOT

Hmm.. well theres two ways to go about this:

1. We either delete the redirect (SITCIOT), which is redirecting to Click It or Ticket. Or..
2. We can mention what SITCIOT means (Stick It to Click It or Ticket) in the Click It or Ticket article and redirect Stick It to Click It or Ticket and SITCIOT both.

I am willing to do the latter if it's ok with you. — Moe 16:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Done :) — Moe 16:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.

Volume 2, Issue 41	9 October 2006	About the Signpost

Interview with Board member Erik Möller	Wall Street Journal associates Wikipedia with Grupthink
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down	Report from the Portuguese Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: IP Block

Hi there Andeh! Thanks for bringing it to my attention, but I stand by the block. At first glance, it might seem a bit harsh to completely write off the user without prior notification/warnings, it's clear from the contributions that the only purpose is to disrupt Wikipedia. The block is for anonymous users only and there's nothing to prevent the user(s) of the IP from creating an account and continue editing. That's just me though, and feel free to bring it to AN/I or AIV for a second opinion, as I'd be totally fine with an unblock if someone wants to watch the IP hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 13:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

TY for RV on my User page

Thanks! Took me awhile to figure out from the logs what was going on, then realized my user page had been vandalized. (Don't I get a a button for that?) I even know who did it, since the wanker sent me an email to crow about it and call me names. I will not be so rude as to post his email addy here. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 16:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank you for the redirect bot for the userboxes per GUS, pain having to do them myself :) --Sirex98 11:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

AP.BOT

Your bot has disrupted my userboxes; I don't want to change anything until you have seen what it did and can offer a solution. Kris 12:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

APBOT

Hi APBOT is currently making a signifacnt % of all edits.. THe servers happen to be under load. Can you slow it down a bit? Rich Farmbrough, 15:19 15 October 2006 (GMT).

Done.--Andeh 15:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 17:27 15 October 2006 (GMT).

AP.BOT

It did this. What does it mean?

• (diff) (hist) . . m User:Slogankid‎; 12:10 . . AP.BOT (Talk | contribs) (BOT - bypassing userbox redirect)

I think It messed up my user boxes--Slogankid 17:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Userbox migration, thank you again

I see why your wikistress is up, too bad some people don't understand the Userbox migrations and why your bot is helping by fixing them, I guess they rather see the left box instead of the right one

, thank you again --Sirex98 18:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Well of course, until the BOT went and b*gg*red things up by replacing the original boxes, people weren't seeing the left box! Although I see the point of migrating boxes in the general space across to userspace (esp. where they are very specific or esoteric), you can hardly blame people who had perfectly ok boxes before, that now have the mess as seen on the left. That's like blaming the guy who parks his car on a road with no lines for the fine he gets when the roadworkers come and paint lines under his wheels while he's away... ;) - HTUK 20:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Userbox migration scope

Hey, thanks for trying to help, but I really don't think the userbox migration is supposed to migrate all userboxes - only the controversial POV ones. Things like the above astronomy interest userbox are helpful to the project and should be encouraged (i.e. they should remain in Template space). I posted something about this at Wikipedia talk:German userbox solution#Scope_of_page. If you don't agree, please still stop moving boxes while this is cleared up. —AySz88\^-^ 20:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment:Some of the userboxes have already migrated, the bot is only fixing them by linking where the userboxes Templates migrated to, I agree that non controversial userboxes shouldn't be moved, but I think you complaning to the wrong person. --Sirex98 20:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Just so you know, GUS has moved to WP:UM (the Userbox migration). Just so you know. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 21:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I did notice that from someone elses edit summary (might've been you), will starting using it soon as it's less characters. Thanks for the reminder.--Andeh 21:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for thinking you were the one who was migrating the boxes. (The fact that someone migrated a box and left the task of changing the links to someone else is even more of an annoyance.) However, the snipplets you cited on my talk page don't seem to contradict the fact that the migration on the English Wikipedia is not supposed to migrate all userboxes; the first one is part of Jimbos' paraphrase of something said by someone else (i.e. he's not suggesting it), and the second one is just a little bit of explanation of how the Germans did it. The section under that clarifies the issue: "Examples [of boxes that should be kept in Template space] include those related to claiming professional or academic expertise, WikiProject affiliations, and claiming access to specialized resources and a willingness to conduct research using them upon request. Templates for these userboxes could stay in template or project space. Controversial and unencyclopedic userbox templates should be moved to user space." This list of examples doesn't explicitly say anything like "browser" or the such, but I think it's fairly obvious that, if one takes them in good faith, they lie within the general idea of "useful information about the user".

I will try to find the correct person to direct this towards. —AySz88\^-^ 03:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

There appears to have been a mistake on the part of the person who migrated those boxes (check the previously-linked section on the talk page of WP:UM); you may wish to stop in case the boxes should be migrated back to their original location. —AySz88\^-^ 03:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me bypass the userbox migration for my user page

Thanks, I thought I was going to have more trouble with bypassing it. I have so much to edit on my user page. --Imax80 22:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Anti-vandalism

Thanks for saving my user page from disgrace.

Thanks Andy. Thandy. The Mekon 06:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hey, thanks for the userbox thing!Drahcir^{my talk} 01:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Ohh fancy font! No problem.--Andeh 01:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

By the way, how did you get the icon up there in your talk page?Drahcir^{my talk} 01:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Check the talk page template.--Andeh 01:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

AP.BOT on Wikipedia:Deletion process

Just to let you know, I rolled back your bot's edits to subst {{afd top}} and {{afd bottom}} on Wikipedia:Deletion process. You may wish to exclude that page from substing those templates on that page. JYolkowski // talk 21:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, don't know how that one got through.--Andeh 09:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)