Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina 1-A Conference
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly 21:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Carolina 1-A Conference
Another editor had tagged it with {{prod}}, but the template was removed without any real improvement to the article to address the concerns raised in the prod. Non-notable organization that asserts little, if any, encyclopedic value. Agent 86 19:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable per WP:ORG and lacks any sources to show any notability. Jayden54 21:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - article shows signs of steady going improvement, with new showing of source credibility. --Daniel ellis 19:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)— Daniel ellis, the creator of this article, has made few or no other edits outside this topic and Rosewood High School.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 03:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, "newspaper coverage" is box-score type stuff or a mention in passing in articles about other subjects (trivial coverage). WP:N requires nontrivial coverage from multiple sources. Seraphimblade 03:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of notability and non-trivial sourcing. -- Kicking222 03:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep article is a valuable source for finding which NC schools are members of conference. Valuable as accessory to other articles. See Rosewood High School chocklitsnoman 00:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)chocklitsnoman — chocklitsnoman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. There are plenty of high school athletic conferences, so what's so special about this one ? For there to be an article we need to see why it's notable, and this isn't made clear. Simply being an athletic conference is not enough - there are plenty of them: tell us why we should know about this one. WMMartin 22:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
