Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur Digs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. -Doc 23:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dinosaur Digs
It is not needed as an article, as it can be merged in to the Zoo Tycoon article. It also sounds like an advertisement. I suggest a merge. Bibliomaniac15 20:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Notable product from massively notable company (Microsoft). Definitely needs cleanup though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's common for expansion packs for games to get their own articles; this one just needs expanding. Also, requesting a merge does not require an AfD. —Michael Hays 21:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyvio. The entire article is lifted from Microsoft -- Whpq 21:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 22:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — per Whpq, it's copyvio. However, if someone changes the text so that it doesn't violate copyright, I would change my vote to keep. Dionyseus 23:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - yes, I should add that I've no problem with a an article on this expansion pack, just the current article's copyvio. -- Whpq 00:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Okay, here's a preview of what I can do with this article. It no longer violates any copyright, but I would like to get everyone's OK before I continue editing.Dflocks80 21:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment - I think Dinosaur Digs should be merged into Zoo Tycoon, since it talks about itself, the two expansion packs, and official downloads in the article, therefore, extraneous articles aren't needed. bibliomaniac15 22:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
