Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero (Chad Kroeger song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep rewritten version. Mailer Diablo 02:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hero (Chad Kroeger song)

Probable copyright violation MacRusgail 22:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete This is a copyvio, rights for reproduction of original material will be held by Kroeger, Nickleback, their record company, etc.  (aeropagitica)  22:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio. While a legitimate article could be written about this song, we don't need copyvios. It seems that a couple of heroes in Bearcat and Samaritan have saved the article so Keep.Capitalistroadster 00:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio, no significant cultural impact is implied or asserted such as with "Let It Be (song)" or "Stairway to Heaven". Dismas|^(talk) 02:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Changing vote after recent edits. The song is still no "Stairway..." but the article at least is worth keeping now. Dismas|^(talk) 10:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio. --Khoikhoi 05:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Ardenn 07:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, copyvio. --Soumyasch 07:11, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep, the new version IS a good start to an article. --Soumyasch 04:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. A possible violation?? --FuriousFreddy 01:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep the resurrected version. --FuriousFreddy 11:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice to a real article. Samaritan 03:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep with Bearcat's save. If an admin gets the chance, they should erase the prior copyvio versions from its history. Samaritan 09:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• I've stripped the lyrics and stubbed it, so it's no longer a copyvio. It ain't much of an article, still, but at least it's about as honest an attempt at the beginnings of one as could be managed by someone who hates everything Nickelback ever even thought about standing for. Probably keepable now, but I don't like to assume. Bearcat 06:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep no longer copyvio, should have used the copyvio template anyway ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment I tried to use the copyvio template, but I didn't know where it had been taken from... --MacRusgail 17:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Moe ε 02:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.