User talk:Swatjester

Links

User Page

Main Page

Talk Page

Userboxes

Sandbox

Quotes

Contribs

[edit] Inbox Comments Go Here

Hi Swat Jester. Thank you for your comment. It has been ignored and deleted. Have a nice day. --Emperor 03:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I saw your notes regarding my article "Professor N S Ramaswamy". It was NOT an experiment to create it in sand box. I am new to wikipedia, and you didn't have to "bite". You could have provided more inputs to improve my article. You will find several articles linked in Padma Bhushan. All these people are padma bhushan award winners, and I don't see any reason why one article which doesn't site sufficient sources is not deleted and the other is deleted.

I never bit you. As for your reasoning, please see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 17:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JohnnyAlbert10

Hi nice to meet you, thanks for the comments on my talk page. On the night of March 20, my brother showed up as User talk:512teking6, vandalized both my talk and user pages. And now he has my computer blocked my wikipedia soi have to use a laptop, and if he vandalizes wikipedia with this then i'm scrued. What do i do? Nice pages you got here, very creative. -- JohnnyAlbert10 2:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

My password is something that he'll never figure out. But I guess this is the only way, he wants me out of wikipedia becuase they kicked him out in January so he don't want his little brother here. Thanks for the help. -- JohnnyAlbert10 2:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

He's back and look at what he posted on my talk page, what do i do he's going to beat me up. -- JohnnyAlbert10 2:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Five clicks to Jesus

Did you even bother to read the post I put up on the talk page, or the page itself? If you had, you would have realized that Five Clicks To Jesus is a harmless game. To quote the page "The purpose of the Five Clicks To Jesus game is simple. It's a game simply to pass the time. It's not intended to offend anyone or stir up any animosity." Also, I think I posted a rather eloquent argument to the speedy deletion on the talk page.

In addition, I don't appreciate you calling it inappropriate and threatening to block me. How this simple game could be seen as inappropriate is beyond me. It's intended to simply waste time. I demand that your deletion of it be reviewed by another administrator.

PhoenixFire296 05:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

In all fairness, I only made the page just now. I wasn't even aware it had been created in the past. I got the idea from someone on Facebook and thought that a Wikipedia article for a Wikipedia game would be appropriate. In fact, I just registered my username in order to create the page. So saying that I'm responsible for creating and recreating it is just unfair. Blame the original creator, whoever that may be, for the first creation, but mine was wholly independent.

PhoenixFire296 05:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chink AfD

The Chink article has been greatly expanded now. Please take a look and see if you are interested in reconsidering your vote for merge. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Burgz33

I noticed you blocked this user for 24 hours, however since then he continues the personal attacks, uncivil/disruptive behavior on this talk page. See [1] and [2]. A long block may be required? Your call. 03:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks by User:Faranbazu

Greetings. If you have time, could you please have a look at this [3], thanks! Shervink 13:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)shervink

[edit] RFA

Hey. Thanks for supporting my RFA. It ended successfully. SGGH 20:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I put in references, added sources and presented verifiable data:

The unfortunate thing is that it was all erased.

After being told by one and all to put in the 

aforementioned things the places where I have

done so were methodically followed and where
I had gone back and added refernces, cources 

and quotations they were all "vanished". Now I

suppose I will go back and do it all again? I don't think so.
  In my efforts to add information to "balance"
the views on many pages as REQUESTED by your 

own editors I have been called "incomprehensible" and having written "nonsense". So when I went back

and added the sources I was using and the quotes 

to show prehaps what I have written is not "nonsense";

my backing information was all erased. Hmm........... 

Should I even continue? I have a library of over three

hundred titles I used to write my book: shall I now 

add it all again to back up my interpolations? And take

the chance of being blocked? When my additions are
vandalized so that I appear to be an idiot? 

Unicorn144 05:11, 25 March 2007

(UTC) This is probably a rhetorical question; 

can this be fixed?Unicorn144 05:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)