Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Enhanced CDs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly (Talk) 17:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List_of_Enhanced_CDs
This article is a duplicate of Category:Enhanced CDs. The article is incomplete as compared to the category. It seems this article was created from a previous list on Enhanced CD and the person didn't see that a category already existed for it. Douglasr007 09:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant list. MER-C 12:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. feydey 15:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 22:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - category covers this much better; ergo redundant. SkierRMH 01:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- delete redundant. —dima/s-ko/ 04:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I just clicked on 8 from the list and not a single one was in the category. So how is it information redundant? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC) OK, I just clicked on another 8 and only one: Britney (album) was in the category. Did anyone actually compare the category to the list before voting? I always like to assume good faith, but it looks like people are voting without actually doing any research. A category and a list are only redundant if they contain the exact same information. If you delete one or the other without making a comparison, you are losing information. Thats why lists and categories are 100% compatible. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I was afraid that some of the albums listed weren't in the category - we could add the category to the albums presented in the list before deleting it. A category is much better for this task than a list. The list is redundant since the category fulfills the task of the list and it really isn't needed. Even though the content in the list is different to the category, the content can still be added to the category regardless. Douglasr007 09:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Not all information within the list is redundant. The list includes the CDs' year of release, which would allow a reader to determine trends in the use of enhanced CDs at a glance. Also, the list includes some red links, and the information that those discs were released in enhanced form would be lost if the list were deleted. Lists with red links are intrinsically good anyway, in that they suggest directions for further expansion of Wikipedia. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 19:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete We don't need two of the same thing.--CJ King 23:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as duplicate. --Wizardman 04:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
