Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Eugene van der Pijll 23:18, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Margo
Delete, non-notable family member of someone possibly notable. Google hits are only 260, and they don't immediately reveal that she has notability in her own right. I will say in advance that I could be wrong on this one, but that's what VfD is for. -Splash 02:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- In light of better research, I'll go for a weak keep because collecting a bunch of non-notable appearances doesn't really make you very notable, IMO. -Splash 04:48, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. IMDB says she appeared in 15 movies and nearly as many television productions. She was probably a minor player. The article is however poorly written and has superfluous content. Maybe cleaned up and somehow merged with either the "Eddie Albert" or "Xavier Cugat" articles. See a recent edit I applied to the article. Hamster Sandwich 02:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep As usual someone jumps the gun at posting articles for deletion. Dwain 02:37, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- I made pretty plain in my nomination that I could be wrong. There's really no need for that kind of reaction. -Splash 04:48, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- I think my reaction was justified in that the article was posted for about 45 seconds before it was nominated for deletion. Where is the need for speed in posting something for deletion? Dwain 16:43, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- I made pretty plain in my nomination that I could be wrong. There's really no need for that kind of reaction. -Splash 04:48, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Doesn't seem to be an article that promotes a high school student not worth mentioning. — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems notable enough. Cnwb 07:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Is this the only "Margo" in the world? I think we need a disambiguation page, or at least a header, especially as the name's another form of Margot. -R. fiend 19:54, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Comment I would suggest a disambiguity with "Margo Albert", because of the close association of her more famous husband "Eddie Albert". And from there perhaps a link to their actor progeny "Edward Albert" I'm still new and don't know how to do that, yet. Would appreciate some direction and I'd be happy to take a shot at it though. Hamster Sandwich 04:31, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep appears notable. JamesBurns 07:22, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but rename to add a last name (or disambig per Fiend). Radiant_>|< 10:56, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Since most research would be directed at the actress' career, in my opinion, the heading should relate to her screen name, in the singular. Hamster Sandwich 04:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but maybe it should be moved to Margo (actor). She is a notable actor (great in The Leopard Man) with a following. Why on earth would you delete this and keep the characters of the Donkey Kong universe? Keep... Keep... Keep Steve Eifert
- Move to Margo Albert or Margo (actress), but not simply Margo. Mmmbeer 19:09, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
