Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origins of Phrases
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Origins of Phrases
Random and unsourced list of phrases. Edison 00:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Indescriminate collection of trivia that is of indeterminal length. Lead me to see how much work is required over at Catch phrase. Worse-case resolution of this discussion: redirect to List of snowclones. Agent 86 01:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete without reservation; the article has no use whatsoever. TSO1D 01:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; I would suggest transwiki to
WikiquoteWiktionary but they don't want this sort of stuff either. As per Maxwell Smart, worst-case scenario would be a merge and redirect with list of snowclones. riana_dzasta 04:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC) - Delete - unsourced, arbitary, trivial, woefully incomplete - thus useless - and indiscriminate listcruft. MER-C 04:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This is just a bizarre article with no meaningful or unifying content. OBriain 04:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the examples are Snowclones per Agent 86 --Steve (Slf67) talk 05:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, completely indiscriminate. Godbless everyone for pointing out List of snowclones to me; I've been grasping for such a term for quite some time now. Postdlf 05:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, this is stupid. The editor who created it must've been drunk or something. —Chowbok ☠ 15:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, speedy per WP:SNOW if appropriate - speedies should err on the side of caution, but the outcome is very, very clear. --Kizor 17:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Agent 86. Although I don't suggest redirect to List of snowclones as per other meanings of "Origins of Phrases". Michaelas10 (Talk) 19:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete has only like 5 and these quotes can be found eleswhere but Chobok please be kind to other editors by not calling them drunk. — Seadog 19:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Kizor. It should probably be speedy. NeoJustin 20:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Cbrown1023 22:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (and "We are all X now" is pretty generic). Danny Lilithborne 23:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom... and
- Comment; seems like pretty good consensus - close & let's move on... SkierRMH,09:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
