Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prison Planet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP NTK 21:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prison Planet

Non-notable B-movie (a rip-off of Mad Max, if the box cover is to be believed), not even available on DVD. Last time I looked, this was an encyclopedia, not "IMDB 2: The Sequel". Was Prod'ed, but tag removed by article creator. Calton | Talk 06:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep as it claims to be shown on the Sci Fi Channel, a notable television network --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per IMDB entry; any number of films meeting notability requirements haven't been released on DVD. Monicasdude 15:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, an IMDB profile does not always mean a movie merits an article, as IMDB is partly based on user contributions--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 15:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Eusebeus 16:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I thought this was about Alex Jones Night Gyr 17:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, if it is indeed shown on Sci-Fi channel. Stifle 17:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Calton is a vandal (check his user talk page) who is wikistalking me and tagging every article of mine for removal. Calton literally judged this movie by its cover and decided that is was to be deleted. Evan1975 18:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • • check his user talk page The one that says "It's clean-up duty, mopping up after the dishonest, incompetent, and fanatical. Can't imagine why you'd have a problem with that"? That page? --Calton | Talk 04:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Fellow, I have nominated exactly two of "your articles" for deletion, the other being the exceedingly wanna-be actor/musician Robert Colin Boyd
      • Calton literally judged this movie by its cover I judged its PLOT by the cover, AND SAID SO.--Calton | Talk 04:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I see two related nominations for deletion, and nothing from you on his Talk page. Hardly wikistalking. Fagstein 18:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
    • He is indeed a noted vandal who stalks new entries and marks them with delete tags. Can't say anything about Wikistalking, though. 67.183.189.78 21:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
      • A "noted vandal", hmmm? Mind telling me where I'm "noted"? Is there an award? Discounts at Starbucks? Maybe free use of the "Vandal of the Month" parking space near the front door? --Calton | Talk 04:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Barely notable. Fagstein 18:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as "notable". Snargle 18:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete unless it can be proven that it was shown on sci fi ⇒SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 19:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - imdb, Sci-fi, etc. more than qualifies unsigned user inserted this into my sig.
• Keep per Monicasdude, not on DVD means nothing but that the DVD people are lagging - for crying out loud I cannot even get The Unsuspected on VHS, let alone on DVD, and that is an underrated classic starring Claude Rains - not to mention Passage to Marseille which stars Bogart and Rains is only available on Canadian VHS, and that is not only a good film but also historical WWII propaganda (there is no justice in this world.) Excuse the personal rant, I could list hundreds of movies more deserving than those two but I happened to be looking for them recently and the puppy's unhappy. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

  Comment: In case my little rant confused things, this is not a good movie. It is a bad movie with a bit of a cult following. Still keepable. KillerChihuahua^?!? 12:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Verifiable film. DVD availability is not a criteria for inclusion (nor, for that matter, is quality). 23skidoo 17:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.