Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Herrick Carter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:39, 10 April 2006]
[edit] Robert Herrick Carter
Non-notable bio about someone. It says is nickname was Johnny appleseed which led me to believe this was fake. Looking through the history of the article, it was created by an IP address which makes me suspect it was about the author of the article. If it is, then he is non-notable. Moe ε 15:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Samir
(the scope) 16:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Stifle (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Stifle (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, apparent hoax. Royboycrashfan
00:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC) - Delete UNLESS the original creator can provide sources. Sethimothy 00:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Check out his induction into CIPA's hall of fame. I'm not saying this makes him notable, but I don't think this is a hoax. From a google search, he does seem to have designed a lot in LA. ConDemTalk 00:55, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Any assertions of notability in the article are too vague to be relied on. I'd be prepared to reconsider if more specific claims were made and referenced. Metamagician3000 01:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no assertion of notability, most probaly a hoax. --Terence Ong
02:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC) - Delete, not notable, even if not a hoax.--Light current 03:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete hoaxcruft ⇒ SWATJester
Ready Aim Fire! 04:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC) - Copyvio of http://cipaweb.org/Hall%20of%20Fame/Inductees/Carter.pdf; regardless of notability, must be deleted. —Quarl (talk) 2006-04-09 08:15Z
- Delete per nom. --Siva1979Talk to me 14:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
